New

Create, analyze, optimize your ETF portfolio. Start now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

NOBLvsRSPETF Comparison

ETF 1
NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

This fund is part of
US High Dividend
-0.53%
VS
ETF 2
RSP

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF

This fund is part of
US Large Cap
-0.35%

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is part of the US Large Cap segment. NOBL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, RSP's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. NOBL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.2% for RSP. NOBL is up 9.66% year-to-date (YTD) with -$531M in YTD flows. RSP performs better with 12.95% YTD performance, and +$13.61B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NOBL and RSP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

NOBL vs RSP performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Cumulative Flows

-0.5 B0 B0.5 B1 B1.5 B2 B2.5 B3 BAug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
NOBL
RSP
-3.22%-2.55%
+3.00%+2.98%
+9.66%+12.95%
+11.26%+16.20%
+29.27%+52.41%
+34.75%+50.40%
Flows
NOBL
RSP
-$55M+$2.83B
-$168M+$5.90B
-$531M+$13.61B
-$1.04B+$13.30B
-$2.23B+$33.02B
+$195M+$46.81B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
NOBL
RSP
+13.43%+10.91%
+11.81%+11.68%
+12.68%+13.99%
+14.33%+16.16%
Max drawdown
NOBL
RSP
-4.43%-3.66%
-9.14%-7.88%
-15.22%-17.79%
-17.94%-21.48%
Max drawdown duration
NOBL
RSP
16d24d
122d65d
400d220d
561d752d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
NOBL
RSP
Last sale
9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
$56.08
$213.17
Previous close
09/09/2026
$56.51
$214.64
Consolidated volume
09/09/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
NOBL
RSP
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NOBL
RSP
Last price
$56.08
$213.17
1D performance
-0.76%
-0.68%
AuM$11.48 B$98.66 B
E/R0.35%0.2%
Characteristics
NOBL
RSP
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderProSharesInvesco
BenchmarkS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats IndexS&P 500 Equal Weight Index
N° of holdings68500
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateOctober 9, 2013April 24, 2003
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

NOBL
USA
91.67%
Other
8.33%
RSP
USA
95.31%
Other
4.69%

Sectors

NOBL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.94%
Industrials
18.55%
Finance
14.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.86%
Healthcare
10.83%
Other
22.87%
RSP
Finance
21.59%
Technology
14.34%
Industrials
13.75%
Healthcare
12.32%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.79%
Other
30.21%
Advertisement

Diversification

NOBL

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

24.83%
RSP

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

3.81%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
NOBL
The J. M. Smucker Co.
1.73%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.72%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.71%
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
1.69%
Hormel Foods Corp.
1.68%
Franklin Resources, Inc.
1.67%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
1.65%
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
1.64%
Cintas Corp.
1.64%
General Dynamics Corp.
1.63%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.63%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
1.63%
Nucor Corp.
1.63%
Johnson & Johnson
1.61%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
1.58%
RSP
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.28%
Global Payments, Inc.
0.27%
Expedia Group, Inc.
0.27%
Bio-Techne Corp.
0.26%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
0.26%
International Paper Co.
0.26%
Genuine Parts Co.
0.25%
GoDaddy, Inc.
0.25%
Zebra Technologies Corp.
0.25%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
0.25%
DoorDash, Inc.
0.25%
Garmin Ltd.
0.24%
Veeva Systems, Inc.
0.24%
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
0.24%
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
0.24%
Frequently asked questions about NOBL and RSP

How have the NOBL and RSP ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 9, 2026, NOBL is up 9.66% year-to-date (YTD), while RSP has returned 12.95%. That puts RSP better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NOBL or RSP?

Year-to-date, the NOBL ETF saw -$531M in flows, compared to +$13.61B for RSP.

Which ETF is more volatile: NOBL or RSP?

Over the past year, NOBL had a volatility of 11.81%, while RSP experienced 11.68%.

Which ETF is bigger: NOBL or RSP?

As of September 9, 2026, NOBL holds $11.48 B in assets under management (AUM), while RSP manages $98.66 B.

What sectors do the NOBL and RSP ETFs invest in?

NOBL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, RSP focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the NOBL ETF and RSP ETF?

NOBL top holdings include The J. M. Smucker Co., Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and AbbVie, Inc.. RSP holds in its top three: PayPal Holdings, Inc., Global Payments, Inc. and Expedia Group, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: NOBL or RSP?

NOBL holds 68 securities with 24.83% of its assets in the top 15. RSP has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.81%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up