Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGLVvsSPLVETF Comparison
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) belong to the same industry segment: US Low Volatility. LGLV's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, SPLV's top sector exposures are Utilities, Financials and Consumer Staples. LGLV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.25% for SPLV. LGLV is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. SPLV performs better with 4.92% YTD performance, and +$362M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGLV and SPLV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGLV vs SPLV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGLV SPLV | -1.76%-0.80% | +3.56%+5.47% | +3.73%+4.92% | +8.93%+4.63% | +47.55%+32.55% | +62.59%+47.83% |
| Flows | LGLV SPLV | +$30M+$145M | -$5M+$257M | +$11M+$362M | +$190M+$238M | +$256M-$3.10B | +$336M-$1.24B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGLV SPLV | +8.44%+8.26% | +12.81%+12.52% | +11.02%+10.86% | +13.01%+12.26% |
| Max drawdown | LGLV SPLV | -3.84%-3.60% | -9.65%-8.94% | -10.12%-9.66% | -17.49%-17.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | LGLV SPLV | 9d9d | 43d139d | 166d186d | 713d793d |
LGLV | SPLV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 6:04 PM | $181.99 | $74.81 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $182.13 | $74.66 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LGLV | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LGLV | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $181.99 | $74.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.20% |
| AuM | $1.16 B | $7.96 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.25% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGLV and SPLV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LGLV is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD), while SPLV has returned 4.92%. That puts SPLV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGLV or SPLV?
Year-to-date, the LGLV ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$362M for SPLV.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGLV or SPLV?
Over the past year, LGLV had a volatility of 12.81%, while SPLV experienced 12.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGLV or SPLV?
As of March 11, 2026, LGLV holds $1.16 B in assets under management (AUM), while SPLV manages $7.96 B.
What sectors do the LGLV and SPLV ETFs invest in?
LGLV leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, SPLV focuses on Utilities, Financials and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the LGLV ETF and SPLV ETF?
LGLV top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, VULCAN MATERIALS and WALMART INC. SPLV holds in its top three: WASTE MANAGEMENT, EVERGY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGLV or SPLV?
LGLV holds 166 securities with 17.6% of its assets in the top 15. SPLV has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.8%.
ETF Comparison: Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF Versus THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV)
ETF Comparison: Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) Versus iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV)
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Low Volatility and Minimum Volatility ETFs
Low Volatility Versus Minimum Volatility ETFs: What's The Difference?
What’s the Difference: Low Volatility vs. Minimum Volatility
What’s the Difference: Low Volatility vs. Minimum Volatility
The Low Volatility Anomaly
Low Volatility U.S. ETFs: How do they work?
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
