Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GQGUvsVTVETF Comparison
GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. GQGU's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Utilities and Consumer Staples. In contrast, VTV's top sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. GQGU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.03% for VTV. GQGU is up 8.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$134M in YTD flows. VTV performs worse with 4.41% YTD performance, and +$3.46B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GQGU and VTV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GQGU vs VTV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GQGU VTV | +1.64%-3.60% | +11.31%+3.78% | +8.67%+4.41% | n/a+19.69% | n/a+60.10% | n/a+72.16% |
| Flows | GQGU VTV | +$107M+$2.47B | +$141M+$4.57B | +$134M+$3.46B | -+$12.83B | -+$20.69B | -+$47.34B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GQGU VTV | +10.21%+10.59% | n/a+14.84% | n/a+12.35% | n/a+14.05% |
| Max drawdown | GQGU VTV | -2.87%-3.81% | n/a-11.42% | n/a-14.39% | n/a-17.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | GQGU VTV | 9d10d | n/a77d | n/a212d | n/a455d |
GQGU | VTV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.80 | $196.98 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $26.55 | $199.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GQGU | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GQGU | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.80 | $196.98 |
| 1D performance | +0.96% | -1.21% |
| AuM | $507.74 M | $167.87 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.03% |
GQGU | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | GQG Partners | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 298 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 14, 2025 | January 26, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GQGU and VTV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GQGU is up 8.67% year-to-date (YTD), while VTV has returned 4.41%. That puts GQGU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GQGU or VTV?
Year-to-date, the GQGU ETF saw +$134M in flows, compared to +$3.46B for VTV.
Which ETF is bigger: GQGU or VTV?
As of March 10, 2026, GQGU holds $507.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTV manages $167.87 B.
What sectors do the GQGU and VTV ETFs invest in?
GQGU leans toward sectors like Financials, Utilities and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, VTV focuses on Financials, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GQGU ETF and VTV ETF?
GQGU top holdings include PHILLIP MORRIS, PROGRESSIVE and AT&T. VTV holds in its top three: JPMORGAN CHASE, BERKSHIRE HATHWAY and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: GQGU or VTV?
GQGU holds 31 securities with 64.1% of its assets in the top 15. VTV has 312 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.82%.
GQG Launches First ETF With a Flexible Approach to U.S. Stocks
ETF Comparison: Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) Versus Vanguard Value ETF (VTV)
ETF Insights: Top 5 Fund Flows and Segments for February 2023
ETFs with the largest one-month inflows/outflows
ETFs with the largest one-month inflows/outflows
Top 3 value ETFs of 2022
Can growth stock ETFs offer tax efficiency?
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.