Can growth stock ETFs offer tax efficiency?

Why growth ETFs?

The bottom line is that growth stocks often pay small or no dividend yields. As a result, growth stock ETFs tend to pay out minimal distribution.

Take the Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) for example. This ETF tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index., which holds 250 large-cap U.S. growth stocks. Currently, the 30-day SEC yield is just 0.71%. 

Compare this to a broad-market index ETF like the Vanguard 500 which holds 505 large-cap growth and value stocks for a blended approach. VOO has a much higher 30-day SEC yield of 1.76%.

In a taxable account, VUG would be significantly more efficient than VOO due to its lower yield. However, using VUG in lieu of VOO limits diversification, given that the former only tracks 250 growth stocks. It's basically missing half of the S&P 500. However, there is a way around this. 

Combining growth + value

It turns out that VUG has a value-oriented ETF pair, the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). This ETF tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, which holds 344 large-cap U.S. value stocks. 

VTV has a 30-day SEC yield of 2.76%, which is even higher than VTI and makes it less tax-efficient. However, we can pair it with VUG and allocate each in a tax-efficient manner.

For example, we could hold VUG in a taxable brokerage account, and VTV in a Roth IRA. This way, we don't lose out on diversification but gain better tax efficiency. VTV's larger distributions won't be taxed, and VUG's smaller distributions will incur less tax.

How does this approach fare versus just holding VOO in all accounts? Take a look at this backtest of 50/50 VUG/VTV rebalanced annually versus 100% VOO from 1993 to the present. 

 The 50/50 blend of VUG in a taxable account and VTV in a tax-advantaged account performed almost identically to just VOO. In fact, it did slightly better, probably due to a rebalancing bonus, but the difference is so small that it's probably just noise. 

Either way, the VUG/VTV combination produced an extremely low tracking error compared to VOO while saving the hypothetical investor substantially on dividend tax. Essentially, all we did was split VOO into its growth and value components and allocated them individually for tax efficiency.

Keep in mind that the above-noted backtest is hypothetical. Investors should always consult a tax attorney or accountant. The information presented above is for general purposes only and should not be construed as legal or investment advice. 

Please note this article is for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.