Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DGROvsNOBLETF Comparison
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. DGRO's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, NOBL's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Staples and Financials. DGRO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.35% for NOBL. DGRO is up 2.71% year-to-date (YTD) with +$896M in YTD flows. NOBL performs better with 4.29% YTD performance, and -$234M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DGRO and NOBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DGRO vs NOBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DGRO NOBL | -3.68%-5.24% | +1.67%+3.51% | +2.71%+4.29% | +18.33%+8.77% | +59.02%+31.76% | +69.47%+42.30% |
| Flows | DGRO NOBL | +$478M-$44M | +$1.23B-$403M | +$896M-$234M | +$2.71B-$1.11B | +$4.08B-$1.88B | +$9.90B+$1.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DGRO NOBL | +9.34%+10.92% | +14.50%+14.83% | +11.95%+12.47% | +13.87%+14.20% |
| Max drawdown | DGRO NOBL | -3.68%-5.29% | -11.18%-11.18% | -13.94%-15.22% | -19.37%-17.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | DGRO NOBL | 28d10d | 51d89d | 208d400d | 708d561d |
DGRO | NOBL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $70.56 | $107.31 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $71.29 | $108.55 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DGRO | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DGRO | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $70.56 | $107.31 |
| 1D performance | -1.02% | -1.14% |
| AuM | $37.77 B | $11.32 B |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DGRO and NOBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DGRO is up 2.71% year-to-date (YTD), while NOBL has returned 4.29%. That puts NOBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DGRO or NOBL?
Year-to-date, the DGRO ETF saw +$896M in flows, compared to -$234M for NOBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: DGRO or NOBL?
Over the past year, DGRO had a volatility of 14.5%, while NOBL experienced 14.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: DGRO or NOBL?
As of March 11, 2026, DGRO holds $37.77 B in assets under management (AUM), while NOBL manages $11.32 B.
What sectors do the DGRO and NOBL ETFs invest in?
DGRO leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, NOBL focuses on Industrials, Consumer Staples and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the DGRO ETF and NOBL ETF?
DGRO top holdings include EXXON, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and JPMORGAN CHASE. NOBL holds in its top three: ALBEMARLE, CH ROBINSON WW and EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASN.
Which ETF is more diversified: DGRO or NOBL?
DGRO holds 397 securities with 34.88% of its assets in the top 15. NOBL has 68 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.08%.
ETF Comparison: Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) Versus iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO)
ETF Comparison: iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) Versus ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)
ETF Central's Ultimate Guide to Dividend Investing, Part 3: Dividend Growth ETFs
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Dividend Growth ETFs
Why Focusing on Quality is Timeless for Equity Investing
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
