Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XLGvsIVWETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. XLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.18% for IVW. XLG is down -3.56% year-to-date (YTD) with -$67M in YTD flows. IVW performs better with -2.65% YTD performance, and -$368M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XLG and IVW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XLG vs IVW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XLG IVW | -1.90%-1.37% | -4.06%-3.45% | -3.56%-2.65% | +24.86%+29.82% | +104.47%+105.43% | +103.33%+92.29% |
| Flows | XLG IVW | +$126M+$156M | -$51M-$440M | -$67M-$368M | +$1.04B-$1.57B | +$6.12B+$5.51B | +$6.27B+$4.51B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XLG IVW | +12.63%+16.40% | +20.14%+22.33% | +16.84%+18.63% | +18.78%+21.11% |
| Max drawdown | XLG IVW | -5.61%-6.09% | -14.61%-15.10% | -20.82%-22.23% | -28.02%-32.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | XLG IVW | 76d42d | 45d45d | 126d124d | 683d794d |
XLG | IVW | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.39 | $117.90 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $57.16 | $119.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XLG | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XLG | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.39 | $117.90 |
| 1D performance | -1.36% | -1.69% |
| AuM | $11.15 B | $64.45 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XLG and IVW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, XLG is down -3.56% year-to-date (YTD), while IVW has lost -2.65%. That puts IVW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XLG or IVW?
Year-to-date, the XLG ETF saw -$67M in flows, compared to -$368M for IVW.
Which ETF is more volatile: XLG or IVW?
Over the past year, XLG had a volatility of 20.14%, while IVW experienced 22.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: XLG or IVW?
As of March 11, 2026, XLG holds $11.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while IVW manages $64.45 B.
What sectors do the XLG and IVW ETFs invest in?
XLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IVW focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the XLG ETF and IVW ETF?
XLG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IVW holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: XLG or IVW?
XLG holds 51 securities with 72.13% of its assets in the top 15. IVW has 140 securities and a top 15 weight of 69.25%.
3 ETFs that Beat the S&P 500 in 2024
Forget Diversification - The Latest ETF Industry Trend is Concentration
Three Things You Need to Know Before Investing in an Active ETF
There's an ETF for That? Magnificent Seven Stocks
The Top Three Moments That Moved ETF Markets in 2023
The Top Three Moments That Moved ETF Markets in 2023
3 ETFs Impacted Most by Nvidia's Recent Earnings Report
ETFs for Exposure to the "Magnificent Seven" Stocks
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
