Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPYGvsXLGETF Comparison
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. SPYG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.2% for XLG. SPYG is down -2.62% year-to-date (YTD) with -$121M in YTD flows. XLG performs worse with -3.56% YTD performance, and -$67M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPYG and XLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPYG vs XLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPYG XLG | -1.36%-1.90% | -3.42%-4.06% | -2.62%-3.56% | +29.98%+24.86% | +106.18%+104.47% | +93.58%+103.33% |
| Flows | SPYG XLG | -$214M+$126M | +$66M-$51M | -$121M-$67M | +$3.38B+$1.04B | +$10.92B+$6.12B | +$17.97B+$6.27B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPYG XLG | +15.97%+12.63% | +22.23%+20.14% | +18.59%+16.84% | +21.09%+18.78% |
| Max drawdown | SPYG XLG | -6.07%-5.61% | -15.09%-14.61% | -22.21%-20.82% | -32.69%-28.02% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPYG XLG | 42d76d | 45d45d | 124d126d | 794d683d |
SPYG | XLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $103.87 | $57.16 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $103.80 | $57.13 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPYG | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPYG | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $103.87 | $57.16 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $43.97 B | $11.15 B |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPYG and XLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SPYG is down -2.62% year-to-date (YTD), while XLG has lost -3.56%. That puts SPYG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPYG or XLG?
Year-to-date, the SPYG ETF saw -$121M in flows, compared to -$67M for XLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPYG or XLG?
Over the past year, SPYG had a volatility of 22.23%, while XLG experienced 20.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPYG or XLG?
As of March 11, 2026, SPYG holds $43.97 B in assets under management (AUM), while XLG manages $11.15 B.
What sectors do the SPYG and XLG ETFs invest in?
SPYG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SPYG ETF and XLG ETF?
SPYG top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. XLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPYG or XLG?
SPYG holds 139 securities with 69.56% of its assets in the top 15. XLG has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.13%.
ETF Comparison: SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) Versus SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV)
3 ETFs that Beat the S&P 500 in 2024
Forget Diversification - The Latest ETF Industry Trend is Concentration
Three Things You Need to Know Before Investing in an Active ETF
There's an ETF for That? Magnificent Seven Stocks
There's an ETF for That? Magnificent Seven Stocks
The Top Three Moments That Moved ETF Markets in 2023
3 ETFs Impacted Most by Nvidia's Recent Earnings Report
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.