NOBLvsRPVETF Comparison
VS
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. NOBL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, RPV's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Both NOBL and RPV have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%. NOBL is up 13.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$656M in YTD flows. RPV performs better with 19.16% YTD performance, and +$322K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NOBL and RPV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NOBL vs RPV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NOBL RPV | +5.73%+3.46% | +4.22%+3.47% | +13.84%+19.16% | +15.64%+23.85% | +46.25%+88.20% | +38.55%+68.55% |
| Flows | NOBL RPV | -$77M+$20M | -$197M+$71M | -$656M+$322K | -$1.02B+$84M | -$2.38B-$710M | -$36M-$1.44B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NOBL RPV | +12.53%+10.83% | +12.17%+11.87% | +12.69%+15.04% | +14.34%+17.26% |
| Max drawdown | NOBL RPV | -8.01%-6.53% | -9.14%-7.70% | -15.22%-14.86% | -17.94%-22.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | NOBL RPV | 58d50d | 122d92d | 400d217d | 561d412d |
Trading data
NOBL | RPV | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.29 | $121.00 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $58.32 | $120.95 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NOBL | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NOBL | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.29 | $121.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $11.73 B | $1.75 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.35% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NOBL
USA
91.18%
Other
8.82%
RPV
USA
93.3%
Other
6.7%
Sectors
NOBL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.55%
Industrials
18.24%
Finance
14.19%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.69%
Healthcare
10.68%
Other
23.65%
RPV
Finance
22.08%
Healthcare
15.93%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.97%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.44%
Energy
11.37%
Other
25.2%
Advertisement
Diversification
NOBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.23%
RPV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NOBL
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.72%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.71%
Erie Indemnity Co.
1.70%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
1.68%
Target Corp.
1.65%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.62%
Abbott Laboratories
1.61%
Genuine Parts Co.
1.59%
Nordson Corp.
1.59%
International Business Machines Corp.
1.58%
Albemarle Corp.
1.58%
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.56%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.55%
Medtronic Plc
1.55%
Fastenal Co.
1.54%
RPV
Centene Corp.
2.61%
Humana, Inc.
2.30%
Bunge Global SA
2.16%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.15%
Target Corp.
1.99%
Ford Motor Co.
1.89%
Dow, Inc.
1.86%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.85%
CVS Health Corp.
1.81%
General Motors Co.
1.80%
Valero Energy Corp.
1.79%
Phillips 66
1.79%
The Mosaic Co.
1.65%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
1.63%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.61%
Frequently asked questions about NOBL and RPV
How have the NOBL and RPV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, NOBL is up 13.84% year-to-date (YTD), while RPV has returned 19.16%. That puts RPV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NOBL or RPV?
Year-to-date, the NOBL ETF saw -$656M in flows, compared to +$322K for RPV.
Which ETF is more volatile: NOBL or RPV?
Over the past year, NOBL had a volatility of 12.17%, while RPV experienced 11.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: NOBL or RPV?
As of October 23, 2026, NOBL holds $11.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while RPV manages $1.75 B.
What sectors do the NOBL and RPV ETFs invest in?
NOBL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, RPV focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the NOBL ETF and RPV ETF?
NOBL top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Roper Technologies, Inc. and Erie Indemnity Co.. RPV holds in its top three: Centene Corp., Humana, Inc. and Bunge Global SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: NOBL or RPV?
NOBL holds 68 securities with 24.23% of its assets in the top 15. RPV has 119 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NOBL & RPV
Advertisement
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Top 3 value ETFs of 2022
November 15, 2022
RPV
How to become a value investor using ETFs
June 30, 2022
RPV
Advertisement
