IBTQvsTLTETF Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) belong to the same industry segment: US Government Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Sovereign and Non-Corporate. IBTQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.07%, versus 0.15% for TLT. IBTQ is down -1.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$148M in YTD flows. TLT performs worse with -3.27% YTD performance, and +$2.13B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBTQ and TLT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IBTQ vs TLT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBTQ TLT | -0.40%-0.02% | -1.25%-3.09% | -1.62%-3.27% | +0.52%-0.02% | n/a-1.99% | n/a-34.42% |
| Flows | IBTQ TLT | +$11M+$5.56B | +$21M+$5.98B | +$148M+$2.13B | +$215M+$1.78B | -+$13.29B | -+$47.29B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBTQ TLT | +4.94%+9.64% | +4.85%+9.36% | n/a+13.32% | n/a+15.49% |
| Max drawdown | IBTQ TLT | -2.21%-6.21% | -4.23%-8.29% | n/a-14.78% | n/a-43.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBTQ TLT | 64d64d | 184d184d | n/a715d | n/a1731d |
IBTQ | TLT | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.42 | $81.95 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $24.41 | $81.87 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IBTQ | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IBTQ | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.42 | $81.95 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | +0.10% |
| AuM | $242.71 M | $46.93 B |
| E/R | 0.07% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 5 holdings out of 5
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
