GLDvsFGDLETF Comparison
VS
The ETFs SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) track the LBMA London Gold Market Fixing Price PM Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: Gold. GLD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.15% for FGDL. GLD is up 8.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2.04B in YTD flows. FGDL performs better with 9.97% YTD performance, and -$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GLD and FGDL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GLD vs FGDL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLD FGDL | -5.88%-10.82% | +6.24%+8.85% | +8.77%+9.97% | +50.64%+51.02% | +136.16%+137.91% | +169.20%n/a |
| Flows | GLD FGDL | -$7.86B-$43M | -$2.04B-$21M | -$2.04B-$21M | +$14.59B+$156M | +$18.28B+$188M | +$13.43B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GLD FGDL | +42.16%+38.55% | +27.33%+25.87% | +19.11%+18.46% | +17.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GLD FGDL | -18.40%-18.36% | -18.40%-18.36% | -18.40%-18.36% | -20.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GLD FGDL | 62d62d | 62d62d | 62d62d | 653dn/a |
Trading data
GLD | FGDL | |
Last sale 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $429.41 | $62.20 |
| Previous close 04/02/2026 | $437.82 | $63.37 |
| Consolidated volume 04/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 3, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GLD | FGDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GLD | FGDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $429.41 | $62.20 |
| 1D performance | -1.92% | -1.85% |
| AuM | $160.07 B | $489.10 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
GLD | FGDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | LBMA London Gold Market Fixing Price PM Index | LBMA London Gold Market Fixing Price PM Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 18, 2004 | June 29, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GLD
Data will be available soon
FGDL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
GLD
Data will be available soon
FGDL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
GLD
Data will be available soon
FGDL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
GLD
Data will be available soon
FGDL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about GLD and FGDL
How have the GLD and FGDL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 1, 2026, GLD is up 8.77% year-to-date (YTD), while FGDL has returned 9.97%. That puts FGDL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GLD or FGDL?
Year-to-date, the GLD ETF saw -$2.04B in flows, compared to -$21M for FGDL.
Which ETF is more volatile: GLD or FGDL?
Over the past year, GLD had a volatility of 27.33%, while FGDL experienced 25.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: GLD or FGDL?
As of April 1, 2026, GLD holds $160.07 B in assets under management (AUM), while FGDL manages $489.10 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about GLD & FGDL
Gold and Silver ETF Prices Are Breaking from NAV During Volatile Markets
February 5, 2026
GLD
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
GLD
Hedging the Hedge: Can Gold Itself Be Protected?
September 26, 2025
GLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
