CZARvsVTETF Comparison
VS
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. CZAR's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, VT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. CZAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.06% for VT. CZAR is down -2.68% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. VT performs better with 3% YTD performance, and +$4.89B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZAR and VT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZAR vs VT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZAR VT | -0.80%+1.43% | -4.26%+0.09% | -2.68%+3.00% | +13.60%+35.79% | n/a+65.30% | n/a+58.41% |
| Flows | CZAR VT | -+$1.98B | -+$4.25B | -+$4.89B | +$6K+$13.40B | -+$21.42B | -+$29.83B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZAR VT | +12.92%+16.83% | +10.33%+12.88% | n/a+13.84% | n/a+15.83% |
| Max drawdown | CZAR VT | -8.27%-9.63% | -8.37%-9.63% | n/a-16.43% | n/a-26.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZAR VT | 60d44d | 165d44d | n/a86d | n/a820d |
Trading data
CZAR | VT | |
Last sale 4/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.09 | $144.98 |
| Previous close 04/09/2026 | $31.32 | $144.95 |
| Consolidated volume 04/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZAR | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZAR | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.09 | $144.98 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $1.55 M | $66.60 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.06% |
Characteristics
CZAR | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | Solactive Natural Monopoly Index | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 90 | 9068 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 13, 2023 | June 24, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZAR
USA
60.57%
United Kingdom
9.56%
Other
29.87%
VT
USA
56.87%
Other
43.13%
Sectors
CZAR
Industrials
26.93%
Information Techn.
26.28%
Financials
7.65%
Health Care
7.56%
Other
31.58%
VT
Information Techn.
24.63%
Financials
14.46%
Industrials
11.36%
Consumer Discreti.
9.58%
Health Care
8.32%
Communication Ser.
7.49%
Other
24.15%
Advertisement
Diversification
CZAR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.73%
VT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.07%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of February 28, 2026
CZAR
BAE SYSTEMS
5.03%
HONEYWELL INTL
4.98%
FORTIVE CORP
4.17%
CISCO-T
4.05%
ASX
3.89%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.76%
US09290D1019
3.71%
RAYMOND JAMES
3.50%
MASTERCARD
3.23%
VISA INCORPORATION
3.18%
PAYCHEX
2.67%
AUTODESK
2.55%
ACCENTURE PLC-A
2.50%
SAGE GROUP
2.49%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.02%
VT
NVIDIA
3.75%
APPLE
3.48%
MICROSOFT-T
2.63%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.82%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.64%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
1.37%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.33%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.33%
META PLATFORMS
1.28%
TESLA
1.03%
LILLY
0.76%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
0.74%
JPMORGAN CHASE
0.69%
SAMSUNG ELECTR
0.64%
EXXON
0.58%
Frequently asked questions about CZAR and VT
How have the CZAR and VT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 10, 2026, CZAR is down -2.68% year-to-date (YTD), while VT has returned 3%. That puts VT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZAR or VT?
Year-to-date, the CZAR ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$4.89B for VT.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZAR or VT?
Over the past year, CZAR had a volatility of 10.33%, while VT experienced 12.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZAR or VT?
As of April 10, 2026, CZAR holds $1.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while VT manages $66.60 B.
What sectors do the CZAR and VT ETFs invest in?
CZAR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, VT focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CZAR ETF and VT ETF?
CZAR top holdings include BAE SYSTEMS, HONEYWELL INTL and FORTIVE CORP. VT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CZAR or VT?
CZAR holds 95 securities with 51.73% of its assets in the top 15. VT has 9954 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.07%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CZAR & VT
Forget Diversification - The Latest ETF Industry Trend is Concentration
November 6, 2024
VT
ETF Central Guide: How to Build Your First ETF Portfolio and Pick the Right ETF
September 12, 2024
VT
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
VT
How to Start Investing in ETFs in 2024: A Beginner's Guide
January 26, 2024
VT
Advertisement
Should you add international equities to your investment portfolio?
November 1, 2022
VT
ETFs to protect against a black swan event
October 10, 2022
VT
Advertisement
