CEFSvsBOXXETF Comparison
Saba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF
Saba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. CEFS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.61%, versus 0.24% for BOXX. CEFS is up 13.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$43M in YTD flows. BOXX performs worse with 3.07% YTD performance, and +$4.57B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CEFS and BOXX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CEFS vs BOXX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CEFS BOXX | -0.23%+0.34% | -1.98%+0.98% | +13.02%+3.07% | +15.16%+4.00% | +78.38%+14.49% | +80.49%n/a |
| Flows | CEFS BOXX | +$4M-$209M | +$19M+$1.19B | +$43M+$4.57B | +$78M+$5.37B | +$228M+$12.96B | +$288M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CEFS BOXX | +8.81%+0.31% | +9.52%+0.39% | +10.43%+0.34% | +12.22%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CEFS BOXX | -4.30%-0.07% | -4.75%-0.07% | -12.48%-0.07% | -16.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CEFS BOXX | 59d6d | 41d6d | 104d6d | 436dn/a |
CEFS | BOXX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.91 | $118.64 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.18 | $118.58 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CEFS | BOXX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.91 | $118.64 |
| 1D performance | -1.12% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $426.78 M | $14.25 B |
| E/R | 2.61% | 0.24% |
CEFS | BOXX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Saba Capital | Alpha Architect |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 21, 2017 | December 28, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
