Explore professionally built ETF model portfolios. Discover now →
A small number of options-based ETFs use complex overlays to deliver the total returns of Treasury bills with better tax efficiency.


Keep up with what matters in ETFs
Get timely ETF insights, market trends, and top ideas straight to your inbox.
Your newsletter subscriptions with us are subject to ETF Central's Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
What's been catching my eye recently is a newer breed of sophisticated options-based ETFs attempting to approximate the total return of short-term Treasury bills while avoiding traditional interest distributions altogether. They do this using a multi-leg options strategy known as a box spread.
A box spread combines a bull call spread with a bear put spread using the same strikes and expiration date. When constructed correctly, the four options create a predetermined payoff at expiration regardless of where the index finishes. Because the final payoff is known in advance, the difference between the price of the box today and its value at expiration reflects an implied financing rate.
There are two sides to this trade. An investor who sells a box receives cash upfront and repays a predetermined amount at expiration, making the position function economically like borrowing money. Go to the other side and purchase the box spread, and you're effectively lending money today in exchange for receiving the risk-free interest rate.
That second implementation is where box spread ETFs become particularly interesting. Rather than holding Treasury bills and collecting interest, an ETF can use options to synthetically recreate a similar return profile. Depending on the instruments used and an investor's individual circumstances, the resulting gains may receive different tax treatment from ordinary Treasury interest.
There is also an obvious benefit to outsourcing the implementation. Box spreads look straightforward on a payoff diagram, but executing them yourself can go badly if you don't understand the underlying options. One of the more infamous examples came from Reddit's r/WallStreetBets, where user u/1R0NYMAN attempted a do-it-yourself box spread through Robinhood that went wrong.
ETF issuers have the infrastructure, trading expertise, and portfolio management resources to implement these strategies more systematically than the average retail investor. Even for options-savvy advisors, packaging the trade inside a liquid and inexpensive ETF can offer a much simpler way to access an otherwise operationally demanding strategy.
So, in the spirit of this column, yes, there's an ETF for that. Today, we'll examine two of the more notable ETFs using box spreads, one from Alpha Architect and another from Calamos Investments.
Stay in the loop — get the latest ETF insights: trends, analysis, and expert picks.
The Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
One unusual feature you'll notice on BOXX's fund page is the absence of a traditional 30-day SEC yield. That's because the fund isn't relying on interest income as its primary source of return. Instead, the relevant metric is average yield to options expiration.
This estimates the annualized return implied by the fund's recently purchased box spreads if those positions are held until expiration, before accounting for fund fees, expenses, and trading commissions. You can think of it as roughly analogous to yield to maturity for a short-term bond, except the return is being locked in through options rather than interest payments.
Over its operating history, BOXX has generally accomplished its primary investment objective, producing returns broadly comparable to one- to three-month Treasury bills while seeking to minimize taxable distributions. However, investors should know that its record on the latter has not been perfect.
Early in its history, BOXX made a distribution of $0.2906 per share ($0.1228 in short-term capital gains and $0.1678 in long-term capital gains). The reason comes down to how the strategy was originally implemented.
At the time, BOXX primarily constructed its spreads using cash-settled S&P 500 index options. These contracts fall under Section 1256 of the Internal Revenue Code, which generally requires positions to be marked to market at year-end. The tax code treats outstanding positions as though they were sold at fair market value, crystallizing gains and losses for tax purposes even if the fund continues holding them.
Moreover, unlike ordinary securities that can potentially be transferred out through an ETF's in-kind redemption process, cash-settled options such as those on the S&P 500 Index cannot simply be handed to an authorized participant in the same manner. That makes it more difficult for the fund to use the ETF creation and redemption mechanism to remove embedded gains from the portfolio.
If the fund realizes net capital gains that cannot otherwise be offset or removed, tax rules can ultimately require those gains to be distributed to shareholders, which is what happened. BOXX subsequently changed its implementation, shifting away from its reliance on cash-settled index options toward FLEX ETF options, including contracts on SPY and QQQ.
That doesn't guarantee BOXX will never make another taxable capital gains distribution. However, the move toward physically settled ETF options should give the fund a better opportunity to use the structural tax advantages that make ETFs attractive in the first place.
Finally, despite all the complexity under the hood, BOXX is relatively affordable. The fund carries a 0.2449% gross expense ratio, reduced by a 0.05% fee waiver to a 0.1949% net expense ratio.
Competing directly against BOX is the Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF
Traditional listed options come with standardized contract terms. Investors choose from the strikes and expiration dates made available by the exchange. FLEX options remain exchange-listed and centrally cleared, but allow institutional investors considerably more flexibility to customize characteristics such as the strike price, expiration date, and certain settlement terms.
Tax efficiency is also central to the strategy, although the fund's name appropriately uses the term "tax-aware" rather than making any promise that distributions will be eliminated altogether. If CBOX does make distributions, they are scheduled on an annual rather than monthly basis. Investors should therefore view reduced taxable distributions as an objective of the strategy rather than a guarantee.
CBOX also has an immediate cost advantage over BOXX. Its 0.19% gross expense ratio is currently reduced by a 0.05% reimbursement, bringing the net expense ratio down to just 0.14%. Despite being a relatively new ETF, liquidity is decent, with a 30-day median bid-ask spread of approximately 0.07%.
One interesting development is how Calamos has begun using CBOX internally across its broader ETF lineup. Rather than holding Treasury bills or a government money market fund as collateral, other Calamos strategies can allocate to CBOX instead. For example, the Calamos Autocallable Income ETF
Please note that this article reflects the author’s personal views and does not represent the opinions of the publication or its affiliates. It is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. It is essential to seek guidance from a registered financial professional before making any investment decisions.
Latest ETF News
See all ETF newsETF Comparison: JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) Versus JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCY)


ETF Comparison: State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Versus State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM)


How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years


Advantages of ETFs over Mutual Funds1/6
Lower Costs
In this guide, we'll explore the advantages of ETFs over mutual funds, giving you valuable insights into why ETFs have gained significant popularity among investors like yourself.
Leveraged ETFs: Unlocking the Potential for Amplified Returns1/6
Understanding Leveraged ETFs
Explore leveraged ETFs: potential for amplified returns & risks. 5 ETFs to consider across equities, commodities & fixed income.
What is a Leveraged ETF?1/6
Introducing Leveraged and Inverse ETFs
In this guide, we'll dive into the world of leveraged ETFs, exploring their definition, mechanics, potential risks, and rewards.
ETF Trends
ETF Industry KPIs August 24, 2026
This week’s KPI data overview highlights key metrics and trends shaping the ETF landscape.

What’sTheFund
What's the Fund | Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ)
James St Aubin, Chief Investment Officer at Ocean Park Asset Management, discuss the DUKZ ETF, exposing investors to the whole spectrum of asset classes in the fixed income markets, through their rules-based process.

ETF Takeaway
ETF Takeaway: Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ)
James St Aubin, Chief Investment Officer at Ocean Park Asset Management discusses the state of fixed income markets and how their DUKZ ETF, through their rules-based process, tactically allocates to 11 sectors of fixed income through underlying ETFs.

ETF Trends
ETF Industry KPIs August 17, 2026
This week’s KPI data overview highlights key metrics and trends shaping the ETF landscape:

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
