Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
VTvsACWIETF Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. VT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.32% for ACWI. VT is down -0.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.92B in YTD flows. ACWI performs worse with -0.74% YTD performance, and +$2.87B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VT and ACWI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VT vs ACWI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VT ACWI | -3.67%-3.51% | +0.29%-0.02% | -0.37%-0.74% | +23.07%+22.54% | +68.55%+71.80% | +57.22%+61.28% |
| Flows | VT ACWI | +$1.21B+$1.76B | +$3.66B+$3.68B | +$2.92B+$2.87B | +$12.41B+$5.06B | +$19.44B+$712M | +$28.48B+$4.69B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VT ACWI | +12.24%+12.67% | +16.39%+16.65% | +13.56%+13.73% | +15.68%+15.57% |
| Max drawdown | VT ACWI | -5.57%-5.42% | -13.43%-13.45% | -16.43%-16.56% | -26.38%-26.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | VT ACWI | 15d15d | 45d45d | 86d87d | 820d750d |
VT | ACWI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $139.55 | $139.53 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $140.55 | $140.45 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VT | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VT | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $139.55 | $139.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.72% | -0.66% |
| AuM | $62.59 B | $27.77 B |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.32% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the VT and ACWI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, VT is down -0.37% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWI has lost -0.74%. That puts VT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VT or ACWI?
Year-to-date, the VT ETF saw +$2.92B in flows, compared to +$2.87B for ACWI.
Which ETF is more volatile: VT or ACWI?
Over the past year, VT had a volatility of 16.39%, while ACWI experienced 16.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: VT or ACWI?
As of March 12, 2026, VT holds $62.59 B in assets under management (AUM), while ACWI manages $27.77 B.
What sectors do the VT and ACWI ETFs invest in?
VT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWI focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the VT ETF and ACWI ETF?
VT top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ACWI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: VT or ACWI?
VT holds 9935 securities with 24.34% of its assets in the top 15. ACWI has 2264 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.6%.
There’s an ETF for That? The Middle East
Forget Diversification - The Latest ETF Industry Trend is Concentration
ETF Central Guide: How to Build Your First ETF Portfolio and Pick the Right ETF
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
How to Start Investing in ETFs in 2024: A Beginner's Guide
How to Start Investing in ETFs in 2024: A Beginner's Guide
Should you add international equities to your investment portfolio?
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
