Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
USMVvsQUSETF Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Both USMV and QUS have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. USMV is up 1.34% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. QUS performs worse with 1.14% YTD performance, and -$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USMV and QUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USMV vs QUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USMV QUS | -0.59%-2.05% | +1.29%+0.77% | +1.34%+1.14% | +5.48%+15.71% | +44.92%+68.94% | +52.76%+73.66% |
| Flows | USMV QUS | -$37M-$30M | +$129M-$23M | -$12M-$20M | -$1.24B-$83M | -$12.74B+$28M | -$14.28B+$63M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USMV QUS | +7.31%+8.64% | +12.13%+14.32% | +10.14%+11.91% | +12.21%+14.39% |
| Max drawdown | USMV QUS | -2.42%-2.59% | -8.88%-10.91% | -9.29%-13.88% | -17.91%-22.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | USMV QUS | 10d10d | 43d46d | 75d128d | 713d701d |
USMV | QUS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $94.99 | $174.26 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $95.42 | $176.09 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
USMV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
USMV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $94.99 | $174.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.45% | -1.04% |
| AuM | $23.08 B | $1.53 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the USMV and QUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, USMV is up 1.34% year-to-date (YTD), while QUS has returned 1.14%. That puts USMV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USMV or QUS?
Year-to-date, the USMV ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to -$20M for QUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: USMV or QUS?
Over the past year, USMV had a volatility of 12.13%, while QUS experienced 14.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: USMV or QUS?
As of March 11, 2026, USMV holds $23.08 B in assets under management (AUM), while QUS manages $1.53 B.
What sectors do the USMV and QUS ETFs invest in?
USMV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, QUS focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the USMV ETF and QUS ETF?
USMV top holdings include EXXON, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and CISCO-T. QUS holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and META PLATFORMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: USMV or QUS?
USMV holds 171 securities with 22.79% of its assets in the top 15. QUS has 542 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.04%.
ETF Comparison: Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) Versus iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV)
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Low Volatility and Minimum Volatility ETFs
ETF Central Guide: All You Need to Know About Factor Investing
Low Volatility Versus Minimum Volatility ETFs: What's The Difference?
Low Volatility Versus Minimum Volatility ETFs: What's The Difference?
Low Volatility U.S. ETFs: How do they work?
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
