Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPDvsIVVETF Comparison
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. SPD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.53%, versus 0.03% for IVV. SPD is down -2.91% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. IVV performs better with -0.78% YTD performance, and -$33.25B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPD and IVV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPD vs IVV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPD IVV | -3.18%-2.26% | -4.03%-1.52% | -2.91%-0.78% | +22.64%+23.12% | +62.84%+83.17% | +46.43%+84.76% |
| Flows | SPD IVV | -$8M-$23.84B | -$818K+$12.83B | -$9M-$33.25B | -$13M+$43.44B | -$130M+$171.21B | +$44M+$211.34B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPD IVV | +12.01%+11.85% | +23.60%+18.23% | +16.79%+14.81% | +16.09%+16.82% |
| Max drawdown | SPD IVV | -4.68%-3.28% | -7.12%-13.71% | -14.87%-18.75% | -26.93%-24.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPD IVV | 75d43d | 133d45d | 98d126d | 897d708d |
SPD | IVV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:26 PM | $38.00 | $673.89 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $38.12 | $679.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPD | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPD | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.00 | $673.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -0.81% |
| AuM | $104.75 M | $721.70 B |
| E/R | 0.53% | 0.03% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPD and IVV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, SPD is down -2.91% year-to-date (YTD), while IVV has lost -0.78%. That puts IVV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPD or IVV?
Year-to-date, the SPD ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to -$33.25B for IVV.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPD or IVV?
Over the past year, SPD had a volatility of 23.6%, while IVV experienced 18.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPD or IVV?
As of March 10, 2026, SPD holds $104.75 M in assets under management (AUM), while IVV manages $721.70 B.
What sectors do the SPD and IVV ETFs invest in?
SPD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, IVV focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SPD ETF and IVV ETF?
SPD top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IVV holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPD or IVV?
SPD holds 504 securities with 43.67% of its assets in the top 15. IVV has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.92%.
Tony’s ETF Buyer’s Guide: Hedged Equity ETFs
ETFs & Markets with Todd Sohn: Is Tech’s Buy-the-Dip Mentality Fading?
3 Important ETFs to Watch in 2025
Why the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Remains the King of ETFs
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 4: Put-Selling and Leverage
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 4: Put-Selling and Leverage
Airbnb and Blackstone Join the S&P 500 Index
Street Global Advisors' Recent Expense Ratio Reductions Highlights the Ongoing Low-Fee ETF Arms Race
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
