Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SMHvsTYLGETF Comparison
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) belongs to the US Info. Technology segment. Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Information Technology. SMH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.64% for TYLG. SMH is up 11.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4.18B in YTD flows. TYLG performs worse with -0.73% YTD performance, and +$700K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMH and TYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SMH vs TYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMH TYLG | -3.32%-0.89% | +8.52%-1.35% | +11.39%-0.73% | +87.81%+27.47% | +242.22%+83.50% | +253.74%n/a |
| Flows | SMH TYLG | +$1.09B+$700K | +$4.56B+$700K | +$4.18B+$700K | +$8.00B+$34K | +$14.50B+$8M | +$17.23B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMH TYLG | +33.42%+18.26% | +36.85%+23.12% | +34.16%+19.20% | +34.92%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SMH TYLG | -10.67%-7.50% | -22.13%-16.36% | -35.84%-23.70% | -45.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SMH TYLG | 14d42d | 46d45d | 356d140d | 562dn/a |
SMH | TYLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $401.03 | $35.43 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $397.33 | $35.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SMH | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SMH | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $401.03 | $35.43 |
| 1D performance | +0.93% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $45.56 B | $11.69 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.64% |
SMH | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Global X |
| Benchmark | MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index | Cboe S&P Technology Select Sector Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 65 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 20, 2011 | November 21, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SMH and TYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SMH is up 11.39% year-to-date (YTD), while TYLG has lost -0.73%. That puts SMH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMH or TYLG?
Year-to-date, the SMH ETF saw +$4.18B in flows, compared to +$700K for TYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMH or TYLG?
Over the past year, SMH had a volatility of 36.85%, while TYLG experienced 23.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMH or TYLG?
As of March 11, 2026, SMH holds $45.56 B in assets under management (AUM), while TYLG manages $11.69 M.
What sectors do the SMH and TYLG ETFs invest in?
SMH leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, TYLG focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SMH ETF and TYLG ETF?
SMH top holdings include NVIDIA, US8740391003 and BROADCOM LIMITED. TYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMH or TYLG?
SMH holds 25 securities with 91.95% of its assets in the top 15. TYLG has 70 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.11%.
ETF Market Weekly Trends: U.S. ETFs Draw $35B as Investors Blend Growth Exposure With Defensive Themes
ETF Market Weekly Trends: Risk-On Rally Pushes Cash into Equities, Bonds, and Crypto
Chinese Artificial Intelligence (AI) DeepSeek: ETF Winners & Losers
ETF Comparison: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Versus iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)
Exploring Sector Rotation: Value vs. Growth
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
