Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QQQvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QQQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. QQQ is down -1.07% year-to-date (YTD) with -$11.83B in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 0.25% YTD performance, and +$595M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQQ and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QQQ vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQ GPIQ | -0.61%-0.61% | -3.08%-0.64% | -1.07%+0.25% | +29.04%+28.17% | +114.41%n/a | +101.40%n/a |
| Flows | QQQ GPIQ | -$6.46B+$140M | -$8.13B+$816M | -$11.83B+$595M | +$8.40B+$2.54B | +$51.08B- | +$75.25B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQQ GPIQ | +16.03%+14.25% | +22.69%+20.63% | +19.64%n/a | +22.57%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QQQ GPIQ | -5.66%-4.79% | -15.74%-14.95% | -22.83%n/a | -35.12%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QQQ GPIQ | 41d40d | 45d45d | 124dn/a | 714dn/a |
QQQ | GPIQ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $607.69 | $51.63 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $607.77 | $51.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QQQ | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QQQ | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $607.69 | $51.63 |
| 1D performance | -0.01% | +0.08% |
| AuM | $391.51 B | $3.09 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.35% |
QQQ | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 10, 1999 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QQQ and GPIQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QQQ is down -1.07% year-to-date (YTD), while GPIQ has returned 0.25%. That puts GPIQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQQ or GPIQ?
Year-to-date, the QQQ ETF saw -$11.83B in flows, compared to +$595M for GPIQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: QQQ or GPIQ?
Over the past year, QQQ had a volatility of 22.69%, while GPIQ experienced 20.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: QQQ or GPIQ?
As of March 10, 2026, QQQ holds $391.51 B in assets under management (AUM), while GPIQ manages $3.09 B.
What sectors do the QQQ and GPIQ ETFs invest in?
QQQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GPIQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QQQ ETF and GPIQ ETF?
QQQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GPIQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQQ or GPIQ?
QQQ holds 101 securities with 58.54% of its assets in the top 15. GPIQ has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.81%.
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 1/21/2026: The "Sell America" Trade is Back. Will it Stick?
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 11/12/2025: With the Shutdown Behind Us, Will the Bulls Take Over?
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.