QDIVvsNOBLETF Comparison

ETF 1

QDIV

Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

-1.16%

Full QDIV fund page

ETF 2

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

This fund is part of

US High Dividend

-0.81%

Full NOBL fund page

Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is part of the US High Dividend segment. QDIV's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, NOBL's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. QDIV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.35% for NOBL. QDIV is up 17.97% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. NOBL performs worse with 12.98% YTD performance, and -$459M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDIV and NOBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

QDIV vs NOBL performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 07/29/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	QDIV NOBL	+7.68%+3.21%	+10.89%+9.11%	+17.97%+12.98%	+19.12%+15.08%	+35.20%+28.40%	+51.28%+39.18%
Flows	QDIV NOBL	-$377K-$43M	-$4M-$219M	-$4M-$459M	-$3M-$968M	-$46M-$2.17B	+$15M+$385M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	QDIV NOBL	+13.51%+13.47%	+12.30%+11.75%	+13.35%+12.60%	+15.36%+14.29%
Max drawdown	QDIV NOBL	-3.24%-3.02%	-8.05%-9.14%	-16.69%-15.22%	-18.40%-17.94%
Max drawdown duration	QDIV NOBL	17d22d	154d122d	408d400d	672d561d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	QDIV	NOBL
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM	$40.25	$58.21
Previous close 07/29/2026	$40.18	$58.43
Consolidated volume 07/29/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of June 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	QDIV	NOBL
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	QDIV	NOBL
Last price	$40.25	$58.21
1D performance	+0.18%	-0.38%
AuM	$30.58 M	$11.90 B
E/R	0.2%	0.35%

Characteristics

	QDIV	NOBL
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Global X	ProShares
Benchmark	S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
N° of holdings	50	69
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	July 13, 2018	October 9, 2013
ESG	No	No

More QDIV data on Trackinsight

More NOBL data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

QDIV

USA

92.21%

Other

7.79%

NOBL

USA

92.87%

Other

7.13%

Sectors

QDIV

Consumer Non-Cycl.

22.44%

Finance

20.03%

Healthcare

13.65%

Industrials

12.23%

Energy

8.84%

Technology

8.74%

Other

14.07%

NOBL

Consumer Non-Cycl.

22.24%

Industrials

19.02%

Finance

14.67%

Non-Energy Materi.

11.34%

Healthcare

10.59%

Other

22.13%

Diversification

QDIV

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

31.53%

NOBL

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

24.57%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026

QDIV

Cincinnati Financial Corp.

2.20%

Hormel Foods Corp.

2.13%

Kimberly-Clark Corp.

2.13%

A. O. Smith Corp.

2.12%

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

2.12%

CDW Corp.

2.11%

The Allstate Corp.

2.11%

Illinois Tool Works Inc.

2.10%

Everest Group Ltd.

2.09%

Dollar General Corp.

2.08%

Snap-On, Inc.

2.08%

Becton, Dickinson & Co.

2.07%

McCormick & Co., Inc.

2.07%

Target Corp.

2.06%

Tyson Foods, Inc.

2.06%

NOBL

Caterpillar, Inc.

1.76%

West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.

1.75%

Hormel Foods Corp.

1.70%

Franklin Resources, Inc.

1.69%

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

1.66%

The J. M. Smucker Co.

1.65%

Nucor Corp.

1.64%

W.W. Grainger, Inc.

1.62%

AbbVie, Inc.

1.62%

Cardinal Health, Inc.

1.61%

Colgate-Palmolive Co.

1.59%

Federal Realty Investment Trust

1.59%

Essex Property Trust, Inc.

1.58%

Kimberly-Clark Corp.

1.56%

PPG Industries, Inc.

1.54%

Frequently asked questions about QDIV and NOBL

How have the QDIV and NOBL ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 29, 2026, QDIV is up 17.97% year-to-date (YTD), while NOBL has returned 12.98%. That puts QDIV better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDIV or NOBL?

Year-to-date, the QDIV ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to -$459M for NOBL.

Which ETF is more volatile: QDIV or NOBL?

Over the past year, QDIV had a volatility of 12.3%, while NOBL experienced 11.75%.

Which ETF is bigger: QDIV or NOBL?

As of July 29, 2026, QDIV holds $30.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while NOBL manages $11.90 B.

What sectors do the QDIV and NOBL ETFs invest in?

QDIV leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, NOBL focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the QDIV ETF and NOBL ETF?

QDIV top holdings include Cincinnati Financial Corp., Hormel Foods Corp. and Kimberly-Clark Corp.. NOBL holds in its top three: Caterpillar, Inc., West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and Hormel Foods Corp..

QDIVvsNOBLETF Comparison

Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

QDIV vs NOBL performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the QDIV and NOBL ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 29, 2026, QDIV is up 17.97% year-to-date (YTD), while NOBL has returned 12.98%. That puts QDIV better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDIV or NOBL?

Year-to-date, the QDIV ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to -$459M for NOBL.

Which ETF is more volatile: QDIV or NOBL?

Over the past year, QDIV had a volatility of 12.3%, while NOBL experienced 11.75%.

Which ETF is bigger: QDIV or NOBL?

As of July 29, 2026, QDIV holds $30.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while NOBL manages $11.90 B.

What sectors do the QDIV and NOBL ETFs invest in?

QDIV leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, NOBL focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the QDIV ETF and NOBL ETF?

QDIV top holdings include Cincinnati Financial Corp., Hormel Foods Corp. and Kimberly-Clark Corp.. NOBL holds in its top three: Caterpillar, Inc., West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and Hormel Foods Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: QDIV or NOBL?

QDIV holds 50 securities with 31.53% of its assets in the top 15. NOBL has 69 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.57%.

The ETF Underdogs, Part 4: Dividend Edition

3 Reasons Why JEPI Remains the King of Active and Covered Call ETFs

ETF Comparison: iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) Versus ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)

ETF Central's Ultimate Guide to Dividend Investing, Part 4: Dividend Quality ETFs

ETF Central's Ultimate Guide to Dividend Investing, Part 3: Dividend Growth ETFs

ETF Central's Ultimate Guide to Dividend Investing, Part 3: Dividend Growth ETFs

How to Invest in Dividend Aristocrats and Dividend Kings Via ETFs

Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up