IWMvsHAPSETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
HAPS
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. IWM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.61% for HAPS. IWM is up 12.8% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7.92B in YTD flows. HAPS performs better with 18.96% YTD performance, and -$8K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWM and HAPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWM vs HAPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWM HAPS | -2.13%+1.44% | -5.28%+1.25% | +12.80%+18.96% | +13.07%+19.06% | +72.87%+67.40% | +27.92%n/a |
| Flows | IWM HAPS | -$328M- | -$1.69B+$86K | -$7.92B-$8K | -$3.36B+$1M | -$3.41B-$2M | -$7.73B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWM HAPS | +13.94%+12.26% | +18.21%+15.34% | +21.10%+20.26% | +22.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWM HAPS | -11.10%-7.11% | -11.10%-10.02% | -27.52%-27.24% | -31.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWM HAPS | 68d57d | 68d83d | 289d393d | 1093dn/a |
Trading data
IWM | HAPS | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $275.75 | $37.33 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $276.67 | $37.28 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IWM | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWM | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $275.75 | $37.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | +0.13% |
| AuM | $74.21 B | $170.78 M |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.61% |
Characteristics
IWM | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 Index | Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 1940 | 431 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2000 | April 12, 2023 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWM
USA
94.99%
Other
5.01%
HAPS
USA
97.75%
Other
2.25%
Sectors
IWM
Finance
26.05%
Healthcare
20.69%
Technology
11.8%
Industrials
10.33%
Other
31.12%
HAPS
Finance
26.94%
Healthcare
19.73%
Technology
15.83%
Other
37.5%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.62%
HAPS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IWM
JFrog Ltd.
0.35%
Moog, Inc.
0.34%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.34%
Glaukos Corp.
0.33%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.33%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.30%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.30%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.29%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.29%
SM Energy Co.
0.29%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.28%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.28%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.28%
HAPS
Twist Bioscience Corp.
2.90%
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
2.10%
Organon & Co.
2.02%
Avnet, Inc.
1.97%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp.
1.97%
Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.
1.91%
Sensient Technologies Corp.
1.80%
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
1.65%
AtriCure, Inc.
1.37%
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.34%
The Chemours Co.
1.33%
GATX Corp.
1.32%
JFrog Ltd.
1.25%
Archrock, Inc.
1.21%
Hancock Whitney Corp.
1.18%
Frequently asked questions about IWM and HAPS
How have the IWM and HAPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, IWM is up 12.8% year-to-date (YTD), while HAPS has returned 18.96%. That puts HAPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWM or HAPS?
Year-to-date, the IWM ETF saw -$7.92B in flows, compared to -$8K for HAPS.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWM or HAPS?
Over the past year, IWM had a volatility of 18.21%, while HAPS experienced 15.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWM or HAPS?
As of October 23, 2026, IWM holds $74.21 B in assets under management (AUM), while HAPS manages $170.78 M.
What sectors do the IWM and HAPS ETFs invest in?
IWM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, HAPS focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IWM ETF and HAPS ETF?
IWM top holdings include JFrog Ltd., Moog, Inc. and UMB Financial Corp.. HAPS holds in its top three: Twist Bioscience Corp., Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. and Organon & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: IWM or HAPS?
IWM holds 1953 securities with 4.62% of its assets in the top 15. HAPS has 431 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.32%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IWM & HAPS
ETF Comparison: NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) Versus Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)
September 25, 2026
IWM
Advertisement
Advertisement
