Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GDOCvsVHTETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) belongs to the Healthcare Technology segment. Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is part of the US Health Care segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. GDOC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.09% for VHT. GDOC is down -6.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. VHT performs better with -3.88% YTD performance, and -$179M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GDOC and VHT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GDOC vs VHT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GDOC VHT | -3.58%-4.77% | -6.96%-4.40% | -6.72%-3.88% | +3.86%+7.54% | +8.93%+25.63% | n/a+29.86% |
| Flows | GDOC VHT | +$2M-$96M | +$2M-$273M | +$2M-$179M | +$920K-$721M | -$77M-$2.54B | --$261M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GDOC VHT | +13.36%+13.42% | +16.34%+17.39% | +14.12%+13.65% | n/a+14.98% |
| Max drawdown | GDOC VHT | -9.98%-6.94% | -12.55%-11.85% | -22.18%-16.88% | n/a-17.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | GDOC VHT | 63d65d | 192d190d | 449d435d | n/a767d |
GDOC | VHT | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.41 | $276.67 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.59 | $277.21 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GDOC | VHT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GDOC | VHT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.41 | $276.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $21.60 M | $16.48 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.09% |
GDOC | VHT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI US IMI Health Care 25/50 Index |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 352 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 11, 2021 | January 26, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GDOC and VHT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GDOC is down -6.72% year-to-date (YTD), while VHT has lost -3.88%. That puts VHT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GDOC or VHT?
Year-to-date, the GDOC ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$179M for VHT.
Which ETF is more volatile: GDOC or VHT?
Over the past year, GDOC had a volatility of 16.34%, while VHT experienced 17.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: GDOC or VHT?
As of March 11, 2026, GDOC holds $21.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while VHT manages $16.48 B.
What sectors do the GDOC and VHT ETFs invest in?
GDOC leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, VHT focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GDOC ETF and VHT ETF?
GDOC top holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC. VHT holds in its top three: LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and ABBVIE.
Which ETF is more diversified: GDOC or VHT?
GDOC holds 39 securities with 69.61% of its assets in the top 15. VHT has 408 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.02%.
My Contrarian Equity ETF Picks For 2026
Healthcare Stocks Drop on Medicare Payment Rate Surprise
Health Care Sector Down After a Cyberattack on UnitedHealth
2024 Stock Market Predictions from Vanguard, BlackRock, & State Street: ETFs to Watch
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Sector ETFs (Vanguard versus State Street SPDR)
Defensive investing: Utility and healthcare sector ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
