Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
Here's how rival sector ETFs from each firm stack up against each other.


In the fiercely competitive world of ETF providers, the battle for investor dollars is intense. Providers constantly vie for the upper hand, often engaging in a ruthless game of one-upmanship on fees, offerings, and various other factors to attract inflows and maintain a competitive edge.
A significant aspect of this competition is the concept of "economy of scale." Once an ETF provider has established a solid reputation and accrued substantial assets under management (AUM) in a particular ETF segment, it becomes increasingly challenging for competitors to break into that space.
This dynamic is vividly illustrated in the arena of sector-specific ETFs, a segment where Vanguard and State Street's SPDR series dominate. These two giants command a significant portion of the assets in the sector ETF category.
For advisors or investors contemplating overweighting or rotating between sectors, understanding the nuances of how Vanguard's and State Street's SPDR sector ETFs stack up against each other is crucial.
Each provider brings unique strengths and characteristics to the table, influencing how their sector ETFs perform and align with different investment strategies.
Let's look at what distinguishes these two leading providers to help you make informed decisions about which ETFs might be the best fit for your portfolio objectives.
Access Trackinsight's reliable and comprehensive data with 500M+ points on 14,000+ ETFs.
Both Vanguard and State Street SPDR offer investors a comprehensive selection of sector ETFs, each providing a lineup of 11 funds that correspond to the respective Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sectors. Here's a quick overview of their respective offerings:
Both Vanguard and State Street SPDR charge the same flat 0.10% expense ratio for these ETFs, translating to $10 annually for every $10,000 invested.
Characteristically, both ETF lineups are robustly capitalized, with most funds boasting billions in AUM. All are passively managed, tracking their respective index, and focus exclusively on U.S. stocks, maintaining low portfolio turnover.
When comparing the sector ETF offerings from Vanguard and State Street SPDR, the first noticeable difference lies in their benchmark indices.
State Street SPDR sector ETFs track Select Sector Indices, which draw their constituents from the sectors of the S&P 500. This creates a portfolio focused on large stocks, typically resulting in a smaller number of holdings.
On the other hand, Vanguard's sector ETFs track MSCI indices, which are not limited to the stocks found in the S&P 500. This results in a broader mix of holdings, including more mid and small-cap stocks, and generally a greater number of holdings overall.
For instance, when comparing the Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (
XLK comprises just 64 holdings, whereas VGT includes 318. Both ETFs are market-cap weighted, meaning their top holdings are similar.
However, XLK is more top-heavy with Microsoft Corp and Apple Inc making up 24.08% and 22.92% of the fund, respectively. In contrast, VGT's allocation to these two stocks is 18.59% for Microsoft Corp and 21.58% for Apple Inc.
There are also differences in liquidity and trading features between the two. Using VGT and XLK as examples, while both ETFs are highly liquid and popular, XLK edges out slightly in this aspect. It has a 30-day median bid-ask spread of just 0.01%, compared to VGT's 0.03%, and typically sees more trading volume.
For active traders, State Street's lineup is often preferred due to its more developed options chain, offering more expiries and strike prices. This can be a significant factor for those employing more complex trading strategies or seeking specific hedging capabilities.
When it comes to choosing between Vanguard and State Street SPDR for passive sector exposure, you really can't go wrong with either. Both offer low-cost options, but your selection should be based on your specific investment objectives.
For buy-and-hold investors, Vanguard's sector ETFs may be the preferable choice. The broader indices that Vanguard's ETFs track result in greater diversification, including better exposure to mid and small-cap stocks. This makes Vanguard's funds a more comprehensive representation of the overall investable market sector, potentially offering a more balanced and varied investment experience.
On the other hand, for traders, SPDR's sector funds might be the better fit. These funds provide concentrated exposure to the major large-cap stocks that are often the primary movers and shakers in their respective sectors. Additionally, the SPDR lineup boasts better options chains and narrower bid-ask spreads, making them ideal for those involved in more frequent trading and complex strategies.
Another interesting approach is to alternate between Vanguard and SPDR funds as part of a tax-loss harvesting strategy. Given their similar holdings and historical performance yet tracking different indices, switching between these funds can be a savvy way to realize losses for tax purposes without significantly altering your market exposure.
Finally, it's worth noting that Vanguard and SPDR aren't the only players in the sector ETF game. Other providers also offer sector ETFs with varying strategies and exposures.
Notable NYSE-listed options include the iShares Global REIT ETF (
These alternatives can provide additional options for investors looking to tailor their sector exposure even further, whether it be through different investment methodologies or varying levels of market cap exposure. You can find more like them via the ETF Central screener.
Please note this article is for information purposes only and does not in any way constitute investment advice. It is essential that you seek advice from a registered financial professional prior to making any investment decision.
Latest ETF News
See all ETF newsEquity Investing 101: Understanding U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFs

Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 4: Put-Selling and Leverage


Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 3: Buffer ETFs


Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 2: Covered Call ETFs


Advantages of ETFs over Mutual Funds1/6
Lower Costs
In this guide, we'll explore the advantages of ETFs over mutual funds, giving you valuable insights into why ETFs have gained significant popularity among investors like yourself.
Leveraged ETFs: Unlocking the Potential for Amplified Returns1/6
Understanding Leveraged ETFs
Explore leveraged ETFs: potential for amplified returns & risks. 5 ETFs to consider across equities, commodities & fixed income.
What is a Leveraged ETF?1/6
Introducing Leveraged and Inverse ETFs
In this guide, we'll dive into the world of leveraged ETFs, exploring their definition, mechanics, potential risks, and rewards.
Asset TV
The ETF Show - Rethinking the 60/40 with Alternatives, Thematics
Christian Magoon, Founder and CEO of Amplify ETFs joins The ETF Show to discuss how alternative strategies and thematics are replacing bonds in the 60/40 portfolio.

ETF Trends
ETF Industry KPIs March 16, 2026
The ETF industry saw 22 new launches and 1 closure last week.

Asset TV
The ETF Show - Markets Remain Resilient Despite US-Iran War
Simeon Hyman, Global Investment Strategist at ProShares joins The ETF Show to discuss the market reaction to the US-Iran war, the market rotation, and the need for quality in investor portfolios.

Asset TV
The ETF Show - US-Iran Conflict Sends Oil ETFs Soaring
Lance McGray, Managing Director and Head of ETF Product at Advisors Asset Management joins The ETF Show.

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
