XOPvsFCGETF Comparison
ETF 1
XOP
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
This fund is part of
US Energy
-1.56%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. XOP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.57% for FCG. XOP is up 30.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$818M in YTD flows. FCG performs worse with 24.99% YTD performance, and +$184M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XOP and FCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XOP vs FCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XOP FCG | -2.70%+0.76% | +1.79%+0.64% | +30.47%+24.99% | +35.22%+29.00% | +38.62%+36.42% | +88.95%+106.86% |
| Flows | XOP FCG | -$302M+$8M | +$260M+$91M | +$818M+$184M | +$760M+$294M | -$888M+$121M | -$3.25B+$260M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XOP FCG | +33.46%+30.33% | +28.02%+26.94% | +28.02%+27.25% | +34.31%+33.62% |
| Max drawdown | XOP FCG | -15.14%-13.10% | -15.14%-13.10% | -34.97%-29.46% | -34.97%-33.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | XOP FCG | 72d71d | 72d71d | 690d679d | 690d1353d |
Trading data
XOP | FCG | |
Last sale 6/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $167.99 | $29.17 |
| Previous close 06/09/2026 | $164.05 | $28.47 |
| Consolidated volume 06/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XOP | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XOP | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $167.99 | $29.17 |
| 1D performance | +2.40% | +2.46% |
| AuM | $3.18 B | $739.81 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.57% |
Characteristics
XOP | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index | ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 32 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 19, 2006 | May 8, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XOP
USA
99.87%
Other
0.13%
FCG
USA
83.55%
Other
16.45%
Sectors
XOP
Energy
88.6%
Other
11.4%
FCG
Energy
79.43%
Other
20.57%
Diversification
XOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.15%
FCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
XOP
APA CORPORATION
2.94%
MURPHY OIL
2.93%
SM ENERGY
2.89%
HF SINCLAIR CORPORATION
2.84%
CHORD ENERGY CORPORATION
2.78%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY
2.77%
COTERRA ENERGY
2.73%
DEVON ENERGY
2.70%
MATADOR RESOURCES
2.69%
US64361Q1013
2.69%
OVINTIV INC
2.66%
US71424F1057
2.66%
CRESCENT ENERGY COMPANY
2.65%
MARATHON PETROLEUM
2.61%
VALERO ENERGY
2.61%
FCG
CONOCOPHILLIPS
4.52%
EOG RESOURCES
4.52%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY
4.42%
OCCIDENTAL U
4.37%
DEVON ENERGY
4.24%
HESS MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
4.03%
COTERRA ENERGY
3.97%
EQT
3.94%
APA CORPORATION
3.88%
US71424F1057
3.88%
OVINTIV INC
3.66%
ANTERO RESOURCES
3.43%
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY
3.25%
SM ENERGY
3.15%
MATADOR RESOURCES
3.09%
Frequently asked questions about XOP and FCG
How have the XOP and FCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 9, 2026, XOP is up 30.47% year-to-date (YTD), while FCG has returned 24.99%. That puts XOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XOP or FCG?
Year-to-date, the XOP ETF saw +$818M in flows, compared to +$184M for FCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: XOP or FCG?
Over the past year, XOP had a volatility of 28.02%, while FCG experienced 26.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: XOP or FCG?
As of June 9, 2026, XOP holds $3.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while FCG manages $739.81 M.
What sectors do the XOP and FCG ETFs invest in?
XOP leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, FCG focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the XOP ETF and FCG ETF?
XOP top holdings include APA CORPORATION, MURPHY OIL and SM ENERGY. FCG holds in its top three: CONOCOPHILLIPS, EOG RESOURCES and DIAMONDBACK ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: XOP or FCG?
XOP holds 50 securities with 41.15% of its assets in the top 15. FCG has 32 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.34%.
Advertisement
Latest news about XOP & FCG
ETF Comparison: State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Versus State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)
January 27, 2026
XOP
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
November 6, 2024
XOP
Advertisement
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
June 10, 2024
XOP
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
June 10, 2024
XOP
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
June 3, 2024
XOP
War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers
May 15, 2024
XOP
Advertisement
