XOPvsFCGETF Comparison
ETF 1
XOP
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
This fund is part of
US Energy
+0.01%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. XOP's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FCG's top sector exposures are Energy, XOP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.57% for FCG. XOP is up 41.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$992M in YTD flows. FCG performs worse with 26.31% YTD performance, and +$92M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XOP and FCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XOP vs FCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XOP FCG | +13.88%+7.62% | +5.45%-1.14% | +41.06%+26.31% | +41.60%+29.82% | +37.00%+27.24% | +139.74%+137.57% |
| Flows | XOP FCG | -$238M-$33M | +$212M-$61M | +$992M+$92M | +$985M+$203M | -$937M+$39M | -$2.64B+$142M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XOP FCG | +30.34%+28.83% | +28.28%+27.01% | +28.09%+27.28% | +33.92%+33.16% |
| Max drawdown | XOP FCG | -15.20%-16.85% | -18.50%-19.59% | -34.97%-29.46% | -34.97%-33.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | XOP FCG | 79d79d | 115d115d | 690d679d | 690d1353d |
Trading data
XOP | FCG | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $174.13 | $29.15 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $175.66 | $29.29 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XOP | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XOP | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $174.13 | $29.15 |
| 1D performance | -0.87% | -0.48% |
| AuM | $3.60 B | $645.37 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.57% |
Characteristics
XOP | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index | ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 19, 2006 | May 8, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XOP
USA
101.87%
Other
-1.87%
FCG
USA
89.89%
Other
10.11%
Sectors
XOP
Energy
90.29%
Other
9.71%
FCG
Energy
97.14%
Other
2.86%
Advertisement
Diversification
XOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.87%
FCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
XOP
Texas Pacific Land Corp.
3.25%
PBF Energy, Inc.
2.98%
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
2.88%
Expand Energy Corp.
2.87%
CNX Resources Corp.
2.85%
EQT Corp.
2.82%
Valero Energy Corp.
2.82%
Antero Resources Corp.
2.75%
HF Sinclair Corp.
2.75%
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
2.71%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
2.71%
Range Resources Corp.
2.65%
Viper Energy, Inc.
2.64%
Permian Resources Corp.
2.60%
Phillips 66
2.59%
FCG
Hess Midstream LP
4.93%
Western Midstream Partners LP
4.92%
EOG Resources, Inc.
4.54%
ConocoPhillips
4.37%
EQT Corp.
4.03%
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.01%
Expand Energy Corp.
3.95%
Devon Energy Corp.
3.93%
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
3.88%
Permian Resources Corp.
3.71%
Ovintiv, Inc.
3.58%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.53%
Range Resources Corp.
3.32%
APA Corp.
3.27%
Matador Resources Co.
3.09%
Frequently asked questions about XOP and FCG
How have the XOP and FCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 22, 2026, XOP is up 41.06% year-to-date (YTD), while FCG has returned 26.31%. That puts XOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XOP or FCG?
Year-to-date, the XOP ETF saw +$992M in flows, compared to +$92M for FCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: XOP or FCG?
Over the past year, XOP had a volatility of 28.28%, while FCG experienced 27.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: XOP or FCG?
As of July 22, 2026, XOP holds $3.60 B in assets under management (AUM), while FCG manages $645.37 M.
What sectors do the XOP and FCG ETFs invest in?
XOP leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, FCG focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the XOP ETF and FCG ETF?
XOP top holdings include Texas Pacific Land Corp., PBF Energy, Inc. and Delek US Holdings, Inc.. FCG holds in its top three: Hess Midstream LP, Western Midstream Partners LP and EOG Resources, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XOP or FCG?
XOP holds 50 securities with 41.87% of its assets in the top 15. FCG has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.06%.
Advertisement
Latest news about XOP & FCG
ETF Comparison: State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Versus State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)
January 27, 2026
XOP
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
November 6, 2024
XOP
Advertisement
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
June 10, 2024
XOP
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
June 10, 2024
XOP
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
June 3, 2024
XOP
War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers
May 15, 2024
XOP
Advertisement
