Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XLUvsFPWRETF Comparison
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) belongs to the US Utilities segment. First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Utilities. XLU is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.96% for FPWR. XLU is up 8.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$947M in YTD flows. FPWR performs better with 13.29% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XLU and FPWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XLU vs FPWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XLU FPWR | +2.77%+2.70% | +9.40%+13.16% | +8.97%+13.29% | +23.99%+27.84% | +55.93%+63.95% | +73.55%+83.08% |
| Flows | XLU FPWR | +$1.14B- | +$914M+$2M | +$947M+$2M | +$3.18B+$3M | +$4.12B-$19M | +$6.85B+$6M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XLU FPWR | +14.74%+10.63% | +15.49%+12.84% | +16.24%+13.31% | +17.15%+14.40% |
| Max drawdown | XLU FPWR | -3.26%-1.86% | -9.19%-8.42% | -18.42%-14.68% | -25.30%-18.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | XLU FPWR | 11d8d | 120d34d | 373d288d | 688d694d |
XLU | FPWR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.96 | $37.69 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $46.50 | $37.38 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XLU | FPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XLU | FPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.96 | $37.69 |
| 1D performance | +0.99% | +0.84% |
| AuM | $24.64 B | $22.38 M |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.96% |
XLU | FPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | SPDR | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P Utilities Select Sector Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 58 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 16, 1998 | August 19, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XLU and FPWR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, XLU is up 8.97% year-to-date (YTD), while FPWR has returned 13.29%. That puts FPWR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XLU or FPWR?
Year-to-date, the XLU ETF saw +$947M in flows, compared to +$2M for FPWR.
Which ETF is more volatile: XLU or FPWR?
Over the past year, XLU had a volatility of 15.49%, while FPWR experienced 12.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: XLU or FPWR?
As of March 12, 2026, XLU holds $24.64 B in assets under management (AUM), while FPWR manages $22.38 M.
What sectors do the XLU and FPWR ETFs invest in?
XLU leans toward sectors like Utilities. Meanwhile, FPWR focuses on Utilities, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the XLU ETF and FPWR ETF?
XLU top holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY, SOUTHERN and DUKE ENERGY. FPWR holds in its top three: DUKE ENERGY, SOUTHERN and NFG.
Which ETF is more diversified: XLU or FPWR?
XLU holds 31 securities with 72.53% of its assets in the top 15. FPWR has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.45%.
ETF Central's Guide to Defensive Sector Investing
Investing in Sector ETFs: Consumer Staples, Healthcare, & Utilities
Exploring Sector Rotation: Value vs. Growth
May 2024 U.S. Sector ETFs Inflows and Outflows Breakdown
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
