XESvsFCGETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. XES is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.57% for FCG. XES is up 57.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$133M in YTD flows. FCG performs worse with 28.75% YTD performance, and +$169M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XES and FCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XES vs FCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XES FCG | +11.20%-8.33% | +33.43%+21.24% | +57.15%+28.75% | +120.96%+41.88% | +81.06%+45.09% | +154.59%+169.43% |
| Flows | XES FCG | +$54M-$60M | +$101M+$148M | +$133M+$169M | +$187M+$277M | +$47M+$69M | +$193M+$294M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XES FCG | +28.24%+28.72% | +31.03%+26.24% | +33.54%+27.23% | +39.60%+33.88% |
| Max drawdown | XES FCG | -5.07%-13.10% | -9.46%-13.10% | -45.92%-29.46% | -45.92%-33.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | XES FCG | 20d29d | 22d29d | 864d679d | 864d1353d |
Trading data
XES | FCG | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 3:42 PM | $128.71 | $30.89 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $128.22 | $30.50 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XES | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 3:42 PM
Live
Closed
XES | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $128.71 | $30.89 |
| 1D performance | +0.38% | +1.28% |
| AuM | $559.92 M | $748.55 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.57% |
Characteristics
XES | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index | ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index |
| N° of holdings | 28 | 34 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 19, 2006 | May 8, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XES
USA
65.78%
Bermuda
11.03%
United Kingdom
8.5%
Other
14.69%
FCG
USA
93.63%
Other
6.37%
Sectors
XES
Energy
87.1%
Other
12.9%
FCG
Energy
86.19%
Other
13.81%
Advertisement
Diversification
XES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
62.32%
FCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.01%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
XES
PATTERSON UTI
4.35%
TIDEWATER
4.30%
HALLIBURTON
4.28%
GB00BMXNWH07
4.27%
TECHNIPFMC PLC
4.23%
SCHLUMBERGER
4.21%
SEADRILL LTD
4.18%
TRANSOCEAN
4.14%
VALARIS LTD
4.14%
HELMERICH AND PAYNE
4.09%
BAKER HUGHES
4.08%
US50012A1088
4.05%
SOLARIS OILFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE
4.02%
WEATHERFORD INTL PLC
4.02%
OCEANEERING INTL
3.96%
FCG
CONOCOPHILLIPS
4.64%
EOG RESOURCES
4.64%
OCCIDENTAL U
4.61%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY
4.19%
DEVON ENERGY
4.14%
APA CORPORATION
4.13%
HESS MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
4.05%
EQT
4.03%
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
4.02%
COTERRA ENERGY
3.87%
US71424F1057
3.80%
ANTERO RESOURCES
3.62%
OVINTIV INC
3.57%
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY
3.54%
SM ENERGY
3.16%
Frequently asked questions about XES and FCG
How have the XES and FCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 28, 2026, XES is up 57.15% year-to-date (YTD), while FCG has returned 28.75%. That puts XES better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XES or FCG?
Year-to-date, the XES ETF saw +$133M in flows, compared to +$169M for FCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: XES or FCG?
Over the past year, XES had a volatility of 31.03%, while FCG experienced 26.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: XES or FCG?
As of April 28, 2026, XES holds $559.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while FCG manages $748.55 M.
What sectors do the XES and FCG ETFs invest in?
XES leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, FCG focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the XES ETF and FCG ETF?
XES top holdings include PATTERSON UTI, TIDEWATER and HALLIBURTON. FCG holds in its top three: CONOCOPHILLIPS, EOG RESOURCES and OCCIDENTAL U.
Which ETF is more diversified: XES or FCG?
XES holds 33 securities with 62.32% of its assets in the top 15. FCG has 38 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.01%.
Advertisement
Latest news about XES & FCG
Natural Gas Futures Plunge Due to Milder Weather and Reduced LNG Exports | ETFs to Watch
July 22, 2024
FCG
Energy Sector Plummets on Fed Comments and Crude Oil Stocks
May 27, 2024
XES
Natural Gas Dead Cat Bounce Amid Oversupply
February 26, 2024
FCG
Oil Prices Fall After a Surprise Jump in U.S. Crude Stockpiles
January 16, 2024
XES
Advertisement
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
FCG
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
FCG
Energy Sector Weighed Down by Oil Prices Amid Sluggish World Data
August 29, 2023
FCG
Natural gas is here to stay: 2 ETFs to add to your watchlist
September 22, 2022
FCG
Advertisement
