UNGvsUGAETF Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) and United States Gasoline ETF (UGA) belong to the same industry segment: Energy. UNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.24%, versus 1.02% for UGA. UNG is down -22.62% year-to-date (YTD) with -$62M in YTD flows. UGA performs better with 129.43% YTD performance, and -$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UNG and UGA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
UNG vs UGA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UNG UGA | -11.63%+0.05% | -7.07%+18.51% | -22.62%+129.43% | -26.71%+119.79% | -67.40%+117.53% | -88.60%+231.69% |
| Flows | UNG UGA | +$46M-$29M | +$70M-$15M | -$62M-$24M | -$141M+$9M | -$303M-$10M | +$717M-$66M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UNG UGA | +35.86%+34.89% | +59.14%+40.02% | +59.01%+32.26% | +65.97%+35.72% |
| Max drawdown | UNG UGA | -18.52%-11.96% | -44.08%-20.88% | -68.28%-25.39% | -92.92%-37.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | UNG UGA | 33d16d | 268d65d | 1092d682d | 1527d1363d |
UNG | UGA | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $9.50 | $143.19 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $9.64 | $141.20 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
UNG | UGA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
UNG | UGA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $9.50 | $143.19 |
| 1D performance | -1.45% | +1.41% |
| AuM | $510.20 M | $155.89 M |
| E/R | 1.24% | 1.02% |
