UNGvsJJETFETF Comparison
VS
United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) and iPath Bloomberg Energy Subindex Total Return ETN (JJETF) belong to the same industry segment: Energy. UNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.24%, versus 0.75% for JJETF. UNG is down -22.62% year-to-date (YTD) with -$62M in YTD flows. JJETF performs better with 141.83% YTD performance, and -$8K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UNG and JJETF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UNG vs JJETF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UNG JJETF | -11.63%+7.10% | -7.07%+30.85% | -22.62%+141.83% | -26.71%+119.54% | -67.40%+58.18% | -88.60%+66.25% |
| Flows | UNG JJETF | +$46M- | +$70M- | -$62M-$8K | -$141M-$8K | -$303M-$143K | +$717M-$192K |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UNG JJETF | +35.86%+38.81% | +59.14%+54.95% | +59.01%+42.81% | +65.97%+44.44% |
| Max drawdown | UNG JJETF | -18.52%-10.88% | -44.08%-28.69% | -68.28%-37.95% | -92.92%-64.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | UNG JJETF | 33d13d | 268d112d | 1092d858d | 1527d1601d |
Trading data
UNG | JJETF | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $9.50 | |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $9.64 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UNG | JJETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UNG | JJETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $9.50 | – |
| 1D performance | -1.45% | – |
| AuM | $510.20 M | $0.33 M |
| E/R | 1.24% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UNG
Data will be available soon
JJETF
Data will be available soon
Sectors
UNG
Data will be available soon
JJETF
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
UNG
Data will be available soon
JJETF
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
UNG
Data will be available soon
JJETF
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UNG and JJETF
How have the UNG and JJETF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, UNG is down -22.62% year-to-date (YTD), while JJETF has returned 141.83%. That puts JJETF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UNG or JJETF?
Year-to-date, the UNG ETF saw -$62M in flows, compared to -$8K for JJETF.
Which ETF is more volatile: UNG or JJETF?
Over the past year, UNG had a volatility of 59.14%, while JJETF experienced 54.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: UNG or JJETF?
As of October 27, 2026, UNG holds $510.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while JJETF manages $0.33 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about UNG & JJETF
US Natural Gas Prices Dip Amidst Supply Glut
October 14, 2024
UNG
Crude and Natural Gas Markets on the Move
August 12, 2024
UNG
Natural Gas Futures Plunge Due to Milder Weather and Reduced LNG Exports | ETFs to Watch
July 22, 2024
UNG
War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers
May 15, 2024
UNG
Advertisement
Natural Gas Dead Cat Bounce Amid Oversupply
February 26, 2024
UNG
Natural Gas Dead Cat Bounce Amid Oversupply
February 26, 2024
UNG
US Natural Gas ETFs Take a Hit
February 19, 2024
UNG
Natural Gas Prices Hit Multi-Year Low Amid Warm Winter and Supply Surplus
February 12, 2024
UNG
Advertisement
