UGAvsUNGETF Comparison
United States Gasoline ETF (UGA) and United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) belong to the same industry segment: Energy. UGA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.02%, versus 1.24% for UNG. UGA is up 134.19% year-to-date (YTD) with -$24M in YTD flows. UNG performs worse with -21.46% YTD performance, and -$145M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UGA and UNG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
UGA vs UNG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UGA UNG | -3.42%-11.60% | +15.38%-9.91% | +134.19%-21.46% | +123.55%-26.24% | +120.55%-64.77% | +229.76%-88.16% |
| Flows | UGA UNG | -$29M-$103M | -$15M-$13M | -$24M-$145M | +$9M-$237M | -$10M-$357M | -$63M+$640M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UGA UNG | +35.32%+36.46% | +39.95%+59.14% | +32.28%+58.97% | +35.73%+65.98% |
| Max drawdown | UGA UNG | -14.53%-17.30% | -20.88%-43.23% | -25.39%-67.80% | -37.61%-92.82% |
| Max drawdown duration | UGA UNG | 28d29d | 65d264d | 682d1088d | 1363d1523d |
UGA | UNG | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $144.92 | $9.58 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $142.39 | $9.89 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
UGA | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
UGA | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $144.92 | $9.58 |
| 1D performance | +1.78% | -3.13% |
| AuM | $159.13 M | $434.51 M |
| E/R | 1.02% | 1.24% |
