TMDVvsNOBLETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. TMDV's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, NOBL's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. Both TMDV and NOBL have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%. TMDV is up 11.54% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. NOBL performs worse with 9.79% YTD performance, and -$545M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TMDV and NOBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TMDV vs NOBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TMDV NOBL | -4.38%-3.41% | +2.53%+2.29% | +11.54%+9.79% | +10.18%+11.61% | +21.72%+28.85% | +24.39%+36.57% |
| Flows | TMDV NOBL | --$69M | --$146M | --$545M | --$1.06B | -$6M-$2.24B | -$23M+$167M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TMDV NOBL | +12.96%+13.50% | +12.12%+11.70% | +13.47%+12.67% | +14.71%+14.33% |
| Max drawdown | TMDV NOBL | -4.67%-5.10% | -9.94%-9.14% | -15.91%-15.22% | -17.21%-17.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | TMDV NOBL | 29d21d | 129d122d | 415d400d | 813d561d |
Trading data
TMDV | NOBL | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:46 PM | $51.68 | $56.34 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $51.56 | $56.56 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TMDV | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:46 PM
Live
Closed
TMDV | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.68 | $56.34 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $4.65 M | $11.48 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.35% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
TMDV
USA
98.08%
Other
1.92%
NOBL
USA
91.67%
Other
8.33%
Sectors
TMDV
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.07%
Finance
19.21%
Non-Energy Materi.
13.55%
Utilities
12.74%
Industrials
12.46%
Other
20.96%
NOBL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.94%
Industrials
18.55%
Finance
14.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.86%
Healthcare
10.83%
Other
22.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
TMDV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.19%
NOBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
TMDV
Genuine Parts Co.
1.85%
RLI Corp.
1.75%
Abbott Laboratories
1.72%
Sonoco Products Co.
1.72%
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
1.67%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.67%
Old Republic International Corp.
1.67%
H2O America
1.66%
American States Water Co.
1.66%
California Water Service Group
1.66%
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
1.65%
Johnson & Johnson
1.65%
MSA Safety, Inc.
1.63%
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
1.63%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
1.62%
NOBL
The J. M. Smucker Co.
1.73%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.72%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.71%
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
1.69%
Hormel Foods Corp.
1.68%
Franklin Resources, Inc.
1.67%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
1.65%
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
1.64%
Cintas Corp.
1.64%
General Dynamics Corp.
1.63%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.63%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
1.63%
Nucor Corp.
1.63%
Johnson & Johnson
1.61%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
1.58%
Frequently asked questions about TMDV and NOBL
How have the TMDV and NOBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, TMDV is up 11.54% year-to-date (YTD), while NOBL has returned 9.79%. That puts TMDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TMDV or NOBL?
Year-to-date, the TMDV ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$545M for NOBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: TMDV or NOBL?
Over the past year, TMDV had a volatility of 12.12%, while NOBL experienced 11.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: TMDV or NOBL?
As of September 14, 2026, TMDV holds $4.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while NOBL manages $11.48 B.
What sectors do the TMDV and NOBL ETFs invest in?
TMDV leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NOBL focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the TMDV ETF and NOBL ETF?
TMDV top holdings include Genuine Parts Co., RLI Corp. and Abbott Laboratories. NOBL holds in its top three: The J. M. Smucker Co., Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and AbbVie, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TMDV or NOBL?
TMDV holds 64 securities with 25.19% of its assets in the top 15. NOBL has 68 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about TMDV & NOBL
Advertisement
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
