TANvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. TAN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. TAN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.75% for URNM. TAN is down -12.1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$149M in YTD flows. URNM performs worse with -23.84% YTD performance, and +$553M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TAN and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TAN vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TAN URNM | -1.22%-11.60% | -15.69%-16.01% | -12.10%-23.84% | -12.07%-29.84% | -2.45%-1.98% | -55.21%+10.51% |
| Flows | TAN URNM | +$60M+$111M | -$247M+$237M | +$149M+$553M | +$204M+$548M | -$58M+$576M | -$997M+$1.07B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TAN URNM | +30.85%+40.33% | +35.01%+43.25% | +35.97%+37.57% | +36.19%+39.34% |
| Max drawdown | TAN URNM | -24.77%-31.79% | -45.54%-49.52% | -51.26%-50.18% | -73.33%-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | TAN URNM | 91d68d | 156d278d | 756d485d | 1815d485d |
Trading data
TAN | URNM | |
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM | $45.79 | $41.22 |
| Previous close 11/03/2026 | $43.34 | $41.32 |
| Consolidated volume 11/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TAN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
TAN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.79 | $41.22 |
| 1D performance | +5.65% | -0.24% |
| AuM | $947.50 M | $1.72 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
TAN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | MAC Global Solar Energy Stock Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 15, 2008 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
TAN
USA
44.84%
Israel
21.81%
China
7.06%
Other
26.29%
URNM
Canada
58.31%
Australia
14.82%
USA
12.93%
Other
13.94%
Sectors
TAN
Industrials
43.37%
Utilities
33.64%
Technology
10.65%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.41%
Other
4.94%
URNM
Energy
74.73%
Non-Corporate
15.26%
Industrials
9.05%
Other
0.96%
Advertisement
Diversification
TAN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.23%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
93.45%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
TAN
Nextpower, Inc.
10.42%
First Solar, Inc.
9.03%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
8.00%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
6.83%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
4.94%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.
4.92%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
4.60%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.83%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
3.82%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.79%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA
3.35%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
2.89%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.75%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.
2.72%
SMA Solar Technology AG
2.34%
URNM
Cameco Corp.
20.49%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
15.26%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
12.95%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.76%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.70%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.58%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.38%
Yellow Cake Plc
4.28%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.27%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.24%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
3.80%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
2.71%
Boss Energy Ltd.
2.38%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
2.37%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
2.28%
Frequently asked questions about TAN and URNM
How have the TAN and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 3, 2026, TAN is down -12.1% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has lost -23.84%. That puts TAN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or URNM?
Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$149M in flows, compared to +$553M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or URNM?
Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 35.01%, while URNM experienced 43.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: TAN or URNM?
As of November 3, 2026, TAN holds $947.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $1.72 B.
What sectors do the TAN and URNM ETFs invest in?
TAN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and URNM ETF?
TAN top holdings include Nextpower, Inc., First Solar, Inc. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: TAN or URNM?
TAN holds 35 securities with 74.23% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 93.45%.
Advertisement
Latest news about TAN & URNM
From Ballots to Bloodbaths: How Political Surprises Can Rock ETF Markets
November 4, 2026
TAN
Advertisement
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
