Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SOXXvsSOXQETF Comparison
iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Information Technology. SOXX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.19% for SOXQ. SOXX is up 13.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.48B in YTD flows. SOXQ performs worse with 11.82% YTD performance, and +$147M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SOXX and SOXQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SOXX vs SOXQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SOXX SOXQ | -5.06%-4.49% | +8.98%+6.88% | +13.63%+11.82% | +79.38%+81.93% | +159.31%+176.86% | +162.80%n/a |
| Flows | SOXX SOXQ | -$34M+$63M | +$2.09B+$177M | +$1.48B+$147M | +$1.82B+$317M | +$2.95B+$586M | +$4.38B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SOXX SOXQ | +36.55%+35.24% | +40.26%+39.58% | +35.23%+35.14% | +36.00%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SOXX SOXQ | -12.05%-11.21% | -24.71%-24.09% | -41.45%-39.34% | -45.85%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SOXX SOXQ | 14d14d | 46d46d | 434d398d | 715dn/a |
SOXX | SOXQ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $342.09 | $62.32 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $338.81 | $61.97 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SOXX | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SOXX | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $342.09 | $62.32 |
| 1D performance | +0.97% | +0.56% |
| AuM | $21.38 B | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.19% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SOXX and SOXQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SOXX is up 13.63% year-to-date (YTD), while SOXQ has returned 11.82%. That puts SOXX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SOXX or SOXQ?
Year-to-date, the SOXX ETF saw +$1.48B in flows, compared to +$147M for SOXQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: SOXX or SOXQ?
Over the past year, SOXX had a volatility of 40.26%, while SOXQ experienced 39.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: SOXX or SOXQ?
As of March 11, 2026, SOXX holds $21.38 B in assets under management (AUM), while SOXQ manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the SOXX and SOXQ ETFs invest in?
SOXX leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, SOXQ focuses on Ferrous metals, It services and computer programming and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SOXX ETF and SOXQ ETF?
SOXX top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES and NVIDIA. SOXQ holds in its top three: Nucor, 3.125% 1apr2032, USD, Aeropuerto Internacional De Tocumen, 4% 11aug2041, USD (R) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, 2.6% 1may2031, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: SOXX or SOXQ?
SOXX holds 31 securities with 76.85% of its assets in the top 15. SOXQ has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.42%.
ETF Comparison: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Versus iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)
ETF Comparison: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Versus iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)
Exploring Sector Rotation: Value vs. Growth
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
The Top 5 Best Performing ETFs of the Last 5 Years
The Top 5 Best Performing ETFs of the Last 5 Years
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Semiconductor ETFs
NVIDIA's Stellar Earnings Boost Semiconductor ETFs
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
