Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SMHvsSHOCETF Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Information Technology. SMH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.4% for SHOC. SMH is up 11.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4.18B in YTD flows. SHOC performs worse with 10.49% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMH and SHOC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SMH vs SHOC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMH SHOC | -3.32%-2.88% | +8.52%+5.77% | +11.39%+10.49% | +87.81%+87.16% | +242.22%+174.77% | +253.74%n/a |
| Flows | SMH SHOC | +$1.09B+$11M | +$4.56B+$8M | +$4.18B+$16M | +$8.00B+$34M | +$14.50B+$76M | +$17.23B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMH SHOC | +33.42%+33.97% | +36.85%+37.46% | +34.16%+34.61% | +34.92%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SMH SHOC | -10.67%-9.99% | -22.13%-22.18% | -35.84%-37.65% | -45.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SMH SHOC | 14d14d | 46d46d | 356d364d | 562dn/a |
SMH | SHOC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $388.21 | $73.63 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $401.03 | $75.72 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SMH | SHOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SMH | SHOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $388.21 | $73.63 |
| 1D performance | -3.20% | -2.76% |
| AuM | $45.56 B | $170.28 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.4% |
SMH | SHOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Strive Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index | Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 20, 2011 | October 5, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SMH and SHOC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SMH is up 11.39% year-to-date (YTD), while SHOC has returned 10.49%. That puts SMH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMH or SHOC?
Year-to-date, the SMH ETF saw +$4.18B in flows, compared to +$16M for SHOC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMH or SHOC?
Over the past year, SMH had a volatility of 36.85%, while SHOC experienced 37.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMH or SHOC?
As of March 11, 2026, SMH holds $45.56 B in assets under management (AUM), while SHOC manages $170.28 M.
What sectors do the SMH and SHOC ETFs invest in?
SMH leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, SHOC focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SMH ETF and SHOC ETF?
SMH top holdings include NVIDIA, US8740391003 and BROADCOM LIMITED. SHOC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and MICRON TECHNOLOGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMH or SHOC?
SMH holds 25 securities with 91.95% of its assets in the top 15. SHOC has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 88.67%.
ETF Market Weekly Trends: U.S. ETFs Draw $35B as Investors Blend Growth Exposure With Defensive Themes
ETF Market Weekly Trends: Risk-On Rally Pushes Cash into Equities, Bonds, and Crypto
Chinese Artificial Intelligence (AI) DeepSeek: ETF Winners & Losers
ETF Comparison: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Versus iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)
Exploring Sector Rotation: Value vs. Growth
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
