SMHvsSHOCETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Information Technology. SMH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.4% for SHOC. SMH is up 40.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5.00B in YTD flows. SHOC performs worse with 39.84% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMH and SHOC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SMH vs SHOC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMH SHOC | +28.39%+28.77% | +27.00%+27.55% | +40.67%+39.84% | +142.99%+142.46% | +315.69%+234.90% | +312.04%n/a |
| Flows | SMH SHOC | +$2.04B+$4M | +$3.14B+$12M | +$5.00B+$13M | +$8.53B+$30M | +$15.45B+$71M | +$17.89B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMH SHOC | +36.85%+36.66% | +29.77%+30.09% | +34.63%+35.04% | +35.05%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SMH SHOC | -14.91%-14.53% | -14.91%-14.53% | -35.84%-37.65% | -45.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SMH SHOC | 42d41d | 42d41d | 356d364d | 562dn/a |
Trading data
SMH | SHOC | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $506.44 | $95.81 |
| Previous close 04/23/2026 | $481.85 | $91.62 |
| Consolidated volume 04/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMH | SHOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SMH | SHOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $506.44 | $95.81 |
| 1D performance | +5.10% | +4.58% |
| AuM | $58.18 B | $210.61 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
SMH | SHOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Strive Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index | Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 20 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 20, 2011 | October 5, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SMH
USA
98.75%
Other
1.25%
SHOC
USA
96.34%
Other
3.66%
Sectors
SMH
Information Techn.
76.7%
Other
23.3%
SHOC
Information Techn.
83.56%
Other
16.44%
Advertisement
Diversification
SMH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
90.16%
SHOC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
87.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
SMH
NVIDIA
19.70%
US8740391003
11.70%
BROADCOM LIMITED
7.80%
USN070592100
5.02%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
4.78%
ANALOG DEVICES
4.74%
KLA CORPORATION
4.71%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
4.69%
APPLIED MATERIAL
4.60%
US5128073062
4.56%
INTEL-T
4.29%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
4.26%
QUALCOMM
4.26%
SYNOPSYS
2.55%
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS
2.50%
SHOC
NVIDIA
22.46%
BROADCOM LIMITED
14.03%
USN070592100
8.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
5.00%
KLA CORPORATION
4.76%
INTEL-T
4.61%
APPLIED MATERIAL
4.46%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
4.26%
US5128073062
4.25%
ANALOG DEVICES
4.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
3.90%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY
2.10%
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS
2.02%
SYNOPSYS
2.01%
QUALCOMM
1.85%
Frequently asked questions about SMH and SHOC
How have the SMH and SHOC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, SMH is up 40.67% year-to-date (YTD), while SHOC has returned 39.84%. That puts SMH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMH or SHOC?
Year-to-date, the SMH ETF saw +$5.00B in flows, compared to +$13M for SHOC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMH or SHOC?
Over the past year, SMH had a volatility of 29.77%, while SHOC experienced 30.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMH or SHOC?
As of April 24, 2026, SMH holds $58.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while SHOC manages $210.61 M.
What sectors do the SMH and SHOC ETFs invest in?
SMH leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, SHOC focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SMH ETF and SHOC ETF?
SMH top holdings include NVIDIA, US8740391003 and BROADCOM LIMITED. SHOC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and USN070592100.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMH or SHOC?
SMH holds 25 securities with 90.16% of its assets in the top 15. SHOC has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 87.97%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SMH & SHOC
ETF Market Weekly Trends: U.S. ETFs Draw $35B as Investors Blend Growth Exposure With Defensive Themes
October 13, 2025
SMH
ETF Market Weekly Trends: Risk-On Rally Pushes Cash into Equities, Bonds, and Crypto
October 6, 2025
SMH
Chinese Artificial Intelligence (AI) DeepSeek: ETF Winners & Losers
January 27, 2025
SMH
Advertisement
ETF Comparison: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Versus iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)
August 22, 2024
SMH
Exploring Sector Rotation: Value vs. Growth
August 5, 2024
SMH
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
June 17, 2024
SMH
Advertisement
