Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SHOCvsVGTETF Comparison
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. SHOC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, VGT's top sector exposures are Information Technology and Industrials.Communication Services, SHOC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.09% for VGT. SHOC is up 7.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. VGT performs worse with -4.34% YTD performance, and +$575M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SHOC and VGT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SHOC vs VGT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SHOC VGT | -3.37%-1.25% | +8.53%-4.27% | +7.35%-4.34% | +76.92%+30.06% | +166.97%+110.01% | n/a+108.98% |
| Flows | SHOC VGT | +$4M-$299M | +$9M+$794M | +$9M+$575M | +$27M+$7.67B | +$69M+$18.08B | -+$20.34B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SHOC VGT | +32.65%+21.87% | +37.50%+27.51% | +34.63%+23.27% | n/a+25.27% |
| Max drawdown | SHOC VGT | -9.99%-8.60% | -22.18%-18.65% | -37.65%-27.38% | n/a-35.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | SHOC VGT | 15d43d | 46d45d | 364d190d | n/a690d |
SHOC | VGT | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.95 | $714.44 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $73.63 | $720.66 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SHOC | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SHOC | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.95 | $714.44 |
| 1D performance | -0.92% | -0.86% |
| AuM | $158.09 M | $108.38 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.09% |
SHOC | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25-50 Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 289 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2022 | January 26, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SHOC and VGT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SHOC is up 7.35% year-to-date (YTD), while VGT has lost -4.34%. That puts SHOC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SHOC or VGT?
Year-to-date, the SHOC ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$575M for VGT.
Which ETF is more volatile: SHOC or VGT?
Over the past year, SHOC had a volatility of 37.5%, while VGT experienced 27.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: SHOC or VGT?
As of March 12, 2026, SHOC holds $158.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while VGT manages $108.38 B.
What sectors do the SHOC and VGT ETFs invest in?
SHOC leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, VGT focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SHOC ETF and VGT ETF?
SHOC top holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and MICRON TECHNOLOGY. VGT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SHOC or VGT?
SHOC holds 30 securities with 88.67% of its assets in the top 15. VGT has 319 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.84%.
3 Mistakes Beginner ETF Investors Make
ETF Comparison: Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) Versus Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)
ETF Deep Dive: iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM)
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
