Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SHOCvsSMHETF Comparison
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. SHOC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, SMH's top sector exposures are Information Technology SHOC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.35% for SMH. SHOC is up 7.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. SMH performs better with 11.39% YTD performance, and +$4.18B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SHOC and SMH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SHOC vs SMH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SHOC SMH | -3.37%-3.32% | +8.53%+8.52% | +7.35%+11.39% | +76.92%+87.81% | +166.97%+242.22% | n/a+253.74% |
| Flows | SHOC SMH | +$4M+$1.09B | +$9M+$4.56B | +$9M+$4.18B | +$27M+$8.00B | +$69M+$14.50B | -+$17.23B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SHOC SMH | +32.65%+33.42% | +37.50%+36.85% | +34.63%+34.16% | n/a+34.92% |
| Max drawdown | SHOC SMH | -9.99%-10.67% | -22.18%-22.13% | -37.65%-35.84% | n/a-45.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | SHOC SMH | 15d14d | 46d46d | 364d356d | n/a562d |
SHOC | SMH | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.95 | $387.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $73.63 | $388.13 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.95 | $387.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.92% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $158.09 M | $45.56 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.35% |
SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index | MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 22 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2022 | December 20, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SHOC and SMH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SHOC is up 7.35% year-to-date (YTD), while SMH has returned 11.39%. That puts SMH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SHOC or SMH?
Year-to-date, the SHOC ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$4.18B for SMH.
Which ETF is more volatile: SHOC or SMH?
Over the past year, SHOC had a volatility of 37.5%, while SMH experienced 36.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: SHOC or SMH?
As of March 12, 2026, SHOC holds $158.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMH manages $45.56 B.
What sectors do the SHOC and SMH ETFs invest in?
SHOC leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, SMH focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SHOC ETF and SMH ETF?
SHOC top holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and MICRON TECHNOLOGY. SMH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, US8740391003 and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: SHOC or SMH?
SHOC holds 30 securities with 88.67% of its assets in the top 15. SMH has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 91.95%.
ETF Market Weekly Trends: U.S. ETFs Draw $35B as Investors Blend Growth Exposure With Defensive Themes
ETF Market Weekly Trends: Risk-On Rally Pushes Cash into Equities, Bonds, and Crypto
Chinese Artificial Intelligence (AI) DeepSeek: ETF Winners & Losers
ETF Comparison: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Versus iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)
Exploring Sector Rotation: Value vs. Growth
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
