Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCDSvsIWMETF Comparison
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. SCDS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, IWM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. SCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.19% for IWM. SCDS is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4K in YTD flows. IWM performs worse with 0.47% YTD performance, and -$4.84B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDS and IWM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCDS vs IWM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDS IWM | -4.92%-4.75% | -1.35%-2.18% | +0.99%+0.47% | +20.99%+24.33% | n/a+48.29% | n/a+12.53% |
| Flows | SCDS IWM | -$4K-$2.39B | -$4K-$2.93B | -$4K-$4.84B | -$17K-$7.34B | --$379M | --$6.82B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDS IWM | +16.80%+18.70% | +22.22%+23.21% | n/a+21.21% | n/a+22.68% |
| Max drawdown | SCDS IWM | -7.40%-8.31% | -16.31%-16.45% | n/a-27.52% | n/a-31.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDS IWM | 49d49d | 52d52d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
SCDS | IWM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.57 | $246.59 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $60.56 | $247.41 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCDS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCDS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.57 | $246.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $7.27 M | $69.44 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.19% |
SCDS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 236 | 1635 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCDS and IWM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SCDS is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD), while IWM has returned 0.47%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDS or IWM?
Year-to-date, the SCDS ETF saw -$4K in flows, compared to -$4.84B for IWM.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDS or IWM?
Over the past year, SCDS had a volatility of 22.22%, while IWM experienced 23.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDS or IWM?
As of March 12, 2026, SCDS holds $7.27 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWM manages $69.44 B.
What sectors do the SCDS and IWM ETFs invest in?
SCDS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, IWM focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the SCDS ETF and IWM ETF?
SCDS top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, FABRINET and VICOR. IWM holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDS or IWM?
SCDS holds 255 securities with 15.48% of its assets in the top 15. IWM has 1942 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.78%.
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 6/27/25: Big Tech is SO Back. Again.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
