SCDSvsIWMETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. SCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.19% for IWM. SCDS is up 20.04% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. IWM performs worse with 12.8% YTD performance, and -$7.92B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDS and IWM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCDS vs IWM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDS IWM | -0.74%-2.13% | -4.33%-5.28% | +20.04%+12.80% | +21.65%+13.07% | n/a+72.87% | n/a+27.92% |
| Flows | SCDS IWM | --$328M | +$759K-$1.69B | +$752K-$7.92B | +$757K-$3.36B | --$3.41B | --$7.73B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDS IWM | +12.46%+13.94% | +17.07%+18.21% | n/a+21.10% | n/a+22.45% |
| Max drawdown | SCDS IWM | -9.60%-11.10% | -9.60%-11.10% | n/a-27.52% | n/a-31.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDS IWM | 68d68d | 68d68d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
Trading data
SCDS | IWM | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.49 | $275.75 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $71.67 | $276.67 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSCDS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCDS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.49 | $275.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $9.30 M | $74.21 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
SCDS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 273 | 1940 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCDS
USA
94.83%
Other
5.17%
IWM
USA
94.99%
Other
5.01%
Sectors
SCDS
Finance
25.7%
Healthcare
18.63%
Technology
14.36%
Industrials
9.76%
Other
31.55%
IWM
Finance
26.05%
Healthcare
20.69%
Technology
11.8%
Industrials
10.33%
Other
31.12%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.14%
IWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
SCDS
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
1.12%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
1.06%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
1.05%
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.95%
Moog, Inc.
0.94%
WSFS Financial Corp.
0.93%
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
0.90%
AZZ, Inc.
0.88%
Enova International, Inc.
0.79%
First Financial Bancorp (Ohio)
0.77%
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
0.76%
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
0.76%
SM Energy Co.
0.75%
Perimeter Solutions, Inc.
0.74%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
0.73%
IWM
JFrog Ltd.
0.35%
Moog, Inc.
0.34%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.34%
Glaukos Corp.
0.33%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.33%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.30%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.30%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.29%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.29%
SM Energy Co.
0.29%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.28%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.28%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.28%
Frequently asked questions about SCDS and IWM
How have the SCDS and IWM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, SCDS is up 20.04% year-to-date (YTD), while IWM has returned 12.8%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDS or IWM?
Year-to-date, the SCDS ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to -$7.92B for IWM.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDS or IWM?
Over the past year, SCDS had a volatility of 17.07%, while IWM experienced 18.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDS or IWM?
As of October 23, 2026, SCDS holds $9.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWM manages $74.21 B.
What sectors do the SCDS and IWM ETFs invest in?
SCDS leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, IWM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCDS ETF and IWM ETF?
SCDS top holdings include The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc., Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. and Twist Bioscience Corp.. IWM holds in its top three: JFrog Ltd., Moog, Inc. and UMB Financial Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDS or IWM?
SCDS holds 273 securities with 13.14% of its assets in the top 15. IWM has 1953 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SCDS & IWM
ETF Comparison: NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) Versus Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)
September 25, 2026
IWM
Advertisement
Advertisement
