Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RYLGvsIWMETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is part of the US Small Cap segment. RYLG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, IWM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. RYLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.19% for IWM. RYLG is up 2.42% year-to-date (YTD) with -$234K in YTD flows. IWM performs better with 2.85% YTD performance, and -$5.75B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RYLG and IWM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RYLG vs IWM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RYLG IWM | -3.24%-4.80% | +1.15%-0.18% | +2.42%+2.85% | +20.81%+27.75% | +35.15%+49.38% | n/a+18.60% |
| Flows | RYLG IWM | --$3.19B | -$234K-$2.64B | -$234K-$5.75B | +$208K-$8.16B | +$5M-$1.49B | --$6.89B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RYLG IWM | +14.70%+18.61% | +19.57%+23.10% | +16.92%+21.21% | n/a+22.68% |
| Max drawdown | RYLG IWM | -4.70%-6.99% | -15.02%-16.45% | -22.43%-27.52% | n/a-31.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | RYLG IWM | 12d47d | 74d52d | 296d289d | n/a1093d |
RYLG | IWM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.38 | $252.85 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $22.35 | $253.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RYLG | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RYLG | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.38 | $252.85 |
| 1D performance | +0.14% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $7.84 M | $70.17 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.19% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RYLG and IWM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, RYLG is up 2.42% year-to-date (YTD), while IWM has returned 2.85%. That puts IWM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RYLG or IWM?
Year-to-date, the RYLG ETF saw -$234K in flows, compared to -$5.75B for IWM.
Which ETF is more volatile: RYLG or IWM?
Over the past year, RYLG had a volatility of 19.57%, while IWM experienced 23.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: RYLG or IWM?
As of March 10, 2026, RYLG holds $7.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWM manages $70.17 B.
What sectors do the RYLG and IWM ETFs invest in?
RYLG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, IWM focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RYLG ETF and IWM ETF?
RYLG top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. IWM holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RYLG or IWM?
RYLG holds 1883 securities with 7.8% of its assets in the top 15. IWM has 1942 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.78%.
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 6/27/25: Big Tech is SO Back. Again.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
