RSSLvsIWMETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. RSSL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.19% for IWM. RSSL is up 12.65% year-to-date (YTD) with -$100M in YTD flows. IWM performs worse with 12.62% YTD performance, and -$6.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSSL and IWM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RSSL vs IWM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSSL IWM | +11.33%+11.31% | +5.10%+5.06% | +12.65%+12.62% | +44.15%+44.02% | n/a+61.79% | n/a+29.04% |
| Flows | RSSL IWM | -$107M-$2.95B | -$55M-$4.29B | -$100M-$6.55B | -$492M-$7.32B | --$687M | --$5.92B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSSL IWM | +21.49%+21.75% | +19.27%+19.33% | n/a+21.28% | n/a+22.60% |
| Max drawdown | RSSL IWM | -10.04%-10.06% | -11.01%-11.03% | n/a-27.52% | n/a-31.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSSL IWM | 63d63d | 82d82d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
RSSL | IWM | |
Last sale 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $108.42 | $277.14 |
| Previous close 04/24/2026 | $108.35 | $276.65 |
| Consolidated volume 04/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RSSL | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RSSL | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $108.42 | $277.14 |
| 1D performance | +0.06% | +0.18% |
| AuM | $1.42 B | $75.96 B |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.19% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
