Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RSSLvsIWMETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. RSSL's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, IWM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. RSSL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.19% for IWM. RSSL is up 2.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$28M in YTD flows. IWM performs better with 2.85% YTD performance, and -$5.75B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSSL and IWM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RSSL vs IWM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSSL IWM | -4.80%-4.80% | -0.18%-0.18% | +2.84%+2.85% | +27.82%+27.75% | n/a+49.38% | n/a+18.60% |
| Flows | RSSL IWM | +$15M-$3.19B | -$78M-$2.64B | -$28M-$5.75B | -$380M-$8.16B | --$1.49B | --$6.89B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSSL IWM | +18.35%+18.61% | +23.05%+23.10% | n/a+21.21% | n/a+22.68% |
| Max drawdown | RSSL IWM | -6.99%-6.99% | -16.46%-16.45% | n/a-27.52% | n/a-31.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSSL IWM | 47d47d | 52d52d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
RSSL | IWM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $99.05 | $252.85 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $99.14 | $253.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RSSL | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RSSL | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $99.05 | $252.85 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $1.36 B | $70.17 B |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.19% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RSSL and IWM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, RSSL is up 2.84% year-to-date (YTD), while IWM has returned 2.85%. That puts IWM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RSSL or IWM?
Year-to-date, the RSSL ETF saw -$28M in flows, compared to -$5.75B for IWM.
Which ETF is more volatile: RSSL or IWM?
Over the past year, RSSL had a volatility of 23.05%, while IWM experienced 23.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: RSSL or IWM?
As of March 10, 2026, RSSL holds $1.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWM manages $70.17 B.
What sectors do the RSSL and IWM ETFs invest in?
RSSL leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, IWM focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RSSL ETF and IWM ETF?
RSSL top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. IWM holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RSSL or IWM?
RSSL holds 1883 securities with 7.74% of its assets in the top 15. IWM has 1942 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.78%.
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 6/27/25: Big Tech is SO Back. Again.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
