RPARvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. RPAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.53%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. RPAR is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD) with -$11M in YTD flows. CSHI performs better with 3.98% YTD performance, and +$1.28B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RPAR and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RPAR vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPAR CSHI | +1.79%+0.35% | -0.28%+1.08% | +2.54%+3.98% | +2.12%+4.84% | +38.47%+16.81% | -0.35%n/a |
| Flows | RPAR CSHI | -$6M+$201M | -$15M+$555M | -$11M+$1.28B | -$3M+$1.41B | -$427M+$1.88B | -$589M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RPAR CSHI | +8.96%+0.22% | +10.13%+0.52% | +10.53%+1.10% | +12.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RPAR CSHI | -6.68%n/a | -8.78%-0.18% | -10.66%-1.52% | -30.35%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RPAR CSHI | 62dn/a | 239d6d | 315d20d | 1539dn/a |
Trading data
RPAR | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.74 | $49.68 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $21.64 | $49.66 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RPAR | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.74 | $49.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.45% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $554.95 M | $2.09 B |
| E/R | 0.53% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
RPAR | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Evoke-Aris | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 5, 2019 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RPAR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
RPAR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
RPAR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
RPAR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about RPAR and CSHI
How have the RPAR and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, RPAR is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 3.98%. That puts CSHI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RPAR or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the RPAR ETF saw -$11M in flows, compared to +$1.28B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: RPAR or CSHI?
Over the past year, RPAR had a volatility of 10.13%, while CSHI experienced 0.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: RPAR or CSHI?
As of October 26, 2026, RPAR holds $554.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.09 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about RPAR & CSHI
ETF Strategies Explained for Dummies (With Examples)
July 29, 2025
RPAR
Risk parity ETFs: Were they effective in 2022?
October 20, 2022
RPAR
Benefits of diversification in a recessionary environment
September 27, 2022
RPAR
Advertisement
A short primer to Hedge Fund ETFs
July 8, 2022
RPAR
A short primer to Hedge Fund ETFs
July 8, 2022
RPAR
Multi-Asset Class ETFs – minimize the stress of asset allocation
June 10, 2022
RPAR
Advertisement
