RLYvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. RLY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. RLY is up 20.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$634M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 4.03% YTD performance, and +$1.29B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RLY and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RLY vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RLY CSHI | +3.07%+0.39% | +4.22%+1.12% | +20.30%+4.03% | +24.20%+4.88% | +56.53%+16.68% | +63.69%n/a |
| Flows | RLY CSHI | -$2M+$210M | +$106M+$564M | +$634M+$1.29B | +$656M+$1.41B | +$680M+$1.89B | +$1.08B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RLY CSHI | +8.59%+0.22% | +10.86%+0.52% | +10.98%+1.09% | +13.09%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RLY CSHI | -4.91%n/a | -7.66%-0.18% | -10.03%-1.52% | -18.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RLY CSHI | 50dn/a | 98d6d | 58d20d | 846dn/a |
Trading data
RLY | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.38 | $49.70 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $37.30 | $49.69 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RLY | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.38 | $49.70 |
| 1D performance | +0.21% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $1.42 B | $2.10 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
RLY | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 25, 2012 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RLY
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
RLY
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
RLY
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
RLY
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about RLY and CSHI
How have the RLY and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, RLY is up 20.3% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 4.03%. That puts RLY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RLY or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the RLY ETF saw +$634M in flows, compared to +$1.29B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: RLY or CSHI?
Over the past year, RLY had a volatility of 10.86%, while CSHI experienced 0.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: RLY or CSHI?
As of October 29, 2026, RLY holds $1.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.10 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about RLY & CSHI
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
January 12, 2023
RLY
A short primer to Hedge Fund ETFs
July 8, 2022
RLY
Advertisement
Advertisement
