Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RCTRvsICLNETF Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. RCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.39% for ICLN. RCTR is up 12.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. ICLN performs better with 12.83% YTD performance, and +$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RCTR vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR ICLN | -0.94%-2.54% | +8.11%+9.76% | +12.15%+12.83% | n/a+63.16% | n/a+0.84% | n/a-22.05% |
| Flows | RCTR ICLN | -+$47M | +$5M+$35M | +$5M+$22M | -+$75M | --$1.82B | --$1.08B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR ICLN | +25.45%+25.38% | n/a+23.12% | n/a+22.29% | n/a+25.68% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR ICLN | -7.92%-8.79% | n/a-10.55% | n/a-44.77% | n/a-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR ICLN | 22d14d | n/a77d | n/a1016d | n/a1591d |
RCTR | ICLN | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.12 | $18.40 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $36.50 | $18.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RCTR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RCTR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.12 | $18.40 |
| 1D performance | -1.05% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $21.81 M | $2.16 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.39% |
RCTR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 90 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | June 24, 2008 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RCTR and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RCTR is up 12.15% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 12.83%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$22M for ICLN.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or ICLN?
As of March 11, 2026, RCTR holds $21.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.16 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and ICLN ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and ICLN ETF?
RCTR top holdings include CAMECO, DOOSAN ENERBILITY and MITSUBISHI HVY. ICLN holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US65290E1010 and FIRST SOLAR.
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or ICLN?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 64.25% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.94%.
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
Week of August 8, 2022 KPI summary
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
