QMARvsSPYIETF Comparison
VS
FT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. QMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.68% for SPYI. QMAR is up 16.51% year-to-date (YTD) with +$71M in YTD flows. SPYI performs worse with 11.28% YTD performance, and +$5.43B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMAR and SPYI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMAR vs SPYI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMAR SPYI | +1.73%+1.71% | +3.39%+2.73% | +16.51%+11.28% | +19.47%+15.93% | +57.12%+60.69% | +73.26%n/a |
| Flows | QMAR SPYI | +$8M+$465M | +$25M+$1.86B | +$71M+$5.43B | +$79M+$6.58B | +$218M+$11.71B | +$380M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMAR SPYI | +6.12%+8.90% | +6.89%+10.72% | +10.85%+12.54% | +13.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QMAR SPYI | -2.58%-2.47% | -3.27%-7.69% | -15.76%-16.58% | -19.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QMAR SPYI | 19d15d | 10d48d | 128d125d | 416dn/a |
Trading data
QMAR | SPYI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.09 | $53.35 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $38.44 | $53.82 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QMAR | SPYI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.09 | $53.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.91% | -0.87% |
| AuM | $611.31 M | $12.49 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
QMAR | SPYI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2020 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMAR
Data will be available soon
SPYI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
QMAR
Data will be available soon
SPYI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
QMAR
Data will be available soon
SPYI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
QMAR
Data will be available soon
SPYI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about QMAR and SPYI
How have the QMAR and SPYI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, QMAR is up 16.51% year-to-date (YTD), while SPYI has returned 11.28%. That puts QMAR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMAR or SPYI?
Year-to-date, the QMAR ETF saw +$71M in flows, compared to +$5.43B for SPYI.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMAR or SPYI?
Over the past year, QMAR had a volatility of 6.89%, while SPYI experienced 10.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMAR or SPYI?
As of October 15, 2026, QMAR holds $611.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while SPYI manages $12.49 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about QMAR & SPYI
ETF comparison: NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) Versus Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX)
September 17, 2026
SPYI
What is a Boomer Candy ETF?
September 8, 2026
SPYI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
SPYI
How Investors can Maximize Tax Efficiency with Income ETFs
July 22, 2026
SPYI
Advertisement
4 Ways to Generate Income with ETFs
October 17, 2025
SPYI
4 Ways to Generate Income with ETFs
October 17, 2025
SPYI
Advertisement
