PSCUvsIWMETF Comparison
ETF 1
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
This fund is part of
US Small Cap
-1.41%
VS
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. PSCU's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Consumer Services and Technology. In contrast, IWM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. PSCU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.19% for IWM. PSCU is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$372K in YTD flows. IWM performs better with 10.57% YTD performance, and -$5.48B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PSCU and IWM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PSCU vs IWM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSCU IWM | -6.42%-4.72% | -8.30%-8.23% | +4.05%+10.57% | +3.66%+11.53% | +24.49%+61.61% | -3.84%+27.88% |
| Flows | PSCU IWM | -$629K+$398M | -$2M+$229M | +$372K-$5.48B | +$372K-$492M | -$6M-$925M | -$8M-$4.50B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PSCU IWM | +12.85%+14.02% | +15.09%+18.35% | +17.99%+21.17% | +18.18%+22.44% |
| Max drawdown | PSCU IWM | -10.23%-11.10% | -10.90%-11.10% | -23.47%-27.52% | -29.95%-31.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | PSCU IWM | 61d61d | 166d61d | 522d289d | 1040d1093d |
Trading data
PSCU | IWM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.57 | $270.44 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $60.32 | $275.08 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PSCU | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PSCU | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.57 | $270.44 |
| 1D performance | -1.24% | -1.69% |
| AuM | $14.30 M | $75.15 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
PSCU | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities and Telecommunication Services Index | Russell 2000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 34 | 1940 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 7, 2010 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PSCU
USA
100%
Other
-0%
IWM
USA
94.99%
Other
5.01%
Sectors
PSCU
Utilities
32.66%
Consumer Services
26.12%
Technology
19.23%
Telecommunication.
17.03%
Other
4.96%
IWM
Finance
26.05%
Healthcare
20.69%
Technology
11.8%
Industrials
10.33%
Other
31.12%
Advertisement
Diversification
PSCU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
69.25%
IWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PSCU
Match Group, Inc.
9.67%
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
7.12%
Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)
5.85%
Versant Media Group, Inc.
5.61%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
5.07%
MDU Resources Group, Inc.
4.24%
Sphere Entertainment Co.
3.99%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.95%
Otter Tail Corp.
3.87%
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
3.79%
American States Water Co.
3.50%
Telephone & Data Systems, Inc.
3.22%
Chesapeake Utilities Corp.
3.21%
Avista Corp.
3.13%
California Water Service Group
3.01%
IWM
JFrog Ltd.
0.35%
Moog, Inc.
0.34%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.34%
Glaukos Corp.
0.33%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.33%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.30%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.30%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.30%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.29%
Old National Bancorp
0.29%
SM Energy Co.
0.29%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.28%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.28%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.28%
Frequently asked questions about PSCU and IWM
How have the PSCU and IWM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, PSCU is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD), while IWM has returned 10.57%. That puts IWM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PSCU or IWM?
Year-to-date, the PSCU ETF saw +$372K in flows, compared to -$5.48B for IWM.
Which ETF is more volatile: PSCU or IWM?
Over the past year, PSCU had a volatility of 15.09%, while IWM experienced 18.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: PSCU or IWM?
As of October 16, 2026, PSCU holds $14.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWM manages $75.15 B.
What sectors do the PSCU and IWM ETFs invest in?
PSCU leans toward sectors like Utilities, Consumer Services and Technology. Meanwhile, IWM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PSCU ETF and IWM ETF?
PSCU top holdings include Match Group, Inc., Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana). IWM holds in its top three: JFrog Ltd., Moog, Inc. and UMB Financial Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: PSCU or IWM?
PSCU holds 34 securities with 69.25% of its assets in the top 15. IWM has 1953 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PSCU & IWM
ETF Comparison: NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) Versus Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)
September 25, 2026
IWM
Advertisement
Advertisement
