New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

PITvsHGERETF Comparison

ETF 1
PIT

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.72%
VS
ETF 2
HGER

Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF

This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.72%

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. PIT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.68% for HGER. PIT is up 60.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$328M in YTD flows. HGER performs worse with 46.49% YTD performance, and +$2.48B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PIT and HGER below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

PIT vs HGER performance and flow charts

Performance

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Cumulative Flows

0 M50 M100 M150 M200 M250 MSep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
PIT
HGER
+1.23%+0.17%
+19.11%+15.47%
+60.69%+46.49%
+67.27%+48.47%
+94.65%+88.93%
n/an/a
Flows
PIT
HGER
+$42M+$247M
+$136M+$862M
+$328M+$2.48B
+$350M+$2.89B
+$365M+$3.82B
--
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
PIT
HGER
+18.27%+13.36%
+23.10%+16.89%
+17.97%+13.91%
n/an/a
Max drawdown
PIT
HGER
-6.05%-4.09%
-16.93%-13.61%
-16.93%-13.61%
n/an/a
Max drawdown duration
PIT
HGER
15d36d
93d90d
93d90d
n/an/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
PIT
HGER
Last sale
10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
$84.77
$36.38
Previous close
10/15/2026
$83.93
$36.04
Consolidated volume
10/15/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

PIT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
PIT
HGER
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PIT
HGER
Last price
$84.77
$36.38
1D performance
+1.00%
+0.94%
AuM$488.27 M$4.97 B
E/R0.55%0.68%
Characteristics
PIT
HGER
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderVanEckHarbor Capital
Benchmark-Quantix Commodity Index
N° of holdings--
Asset class-Commodities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 20, 2022February 9, 2022
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

PIT
Data will be available soon
HGER
Data will be available soon

Sectors

PIT
Data will be available soon
HGER
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

PIT
Data will be available soon
HGER
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970
PIT
Data will be available soon
HGER
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PIT and HGER

How have the PIT and HGER ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, PIT is up 60.69% year-to-date (YTD), while HGER has returned 46.49%. That puts PIT better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PIT or HGER?

Year-to-date, the PIT ETF saw +$328M in flows, compared to +$2.48B for HGER.

Which ETF is more volatile: PIT or HGER?

Over the past year, PIT had a volatility of 23.1%, while HGER experienced 16.89%.

Which ETF is bigger: PIT or HGER?

As of October 16, 2026, PIT holds $488.27 M in assets under management (AUM), while HGER manages $4.97 B.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026