PBDvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. PBD's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. PBD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.39% for ICLN. PBD is up 13.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. ICLN performs worse with 12.45% YTD performance, and +$416M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBD and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PBD vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBD ICLN | -9.28%-10.30% | -7.29%-4.74% | +13.82%+12.45% | +37.97%+38.44% | -2.41%+1.13% | -28.16%-10.12% |
| Flows | PBD ICLN | --$222M | +$11M+$330M | +$7M+$416M | +$78M+$553M | +$19M-$1.05B | -$71M-$1.68B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBD ICLN | +29.44%+36.56% | +23.88%+28.06% | +23.99%+24.26% | +26.37%+26.35% |
| Max drawdown | PBD ICLN | -18.34%-22.17% | -18.34%-22.17% | -52.08%-42.62% | -68.69%-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBD ICLN | 45d45d | 45d45d | 996d924d | 1706d1719d |
Trading data
PBD | ICLN | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.15 | $18.37 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $18.21 | $18.35 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PBD | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PBD | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.15 | $18.37 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | +0.11% |
| AuM | $191.74 M | $2.46 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
PBD | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index |
| N° of holdings | 110 | 105 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2007 | June 24, 2008 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PBD
USA
19.36%
Taiwan
12.03%
China
10.62%
Republic of Korea
9.89%
Other
48.1%
ICLN
USA
46.82%
China
18.13%
Other
35.05%
Sectors
PBD
Industrials
56.88%
Utilities
16.14%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.77%
Technology
8.69%
Other
8.52%
ICLN
Industrials
56.96%
Utilities
32.13%
Technology
9.24%
Other
1.67%
Advertisement
Diversification
PBD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.24%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
PBD
ITM Power Plc
2.57%
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
2.21%
Ceres Power Holdings plc
2.07%
Doosan Fuel Cell Co., Ltd.
1.92%
Plug Power, Inc.
1.68%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
1.58%
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.55%
SMA Solar Technology AG
1.51%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.45%
LS Corp.
1.37%
LS Electric Co., Ltd.
1.33%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
1.28%
Alfen NV
1.27%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
1.25%
West Holdings Corp.
1.22%
ICLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
12.14%
First Solar, Inc.
9.55%
Nextpower, Inc.
8.40%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
5.92%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
5.31%
Plug Power, Inc.
3.64%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
3.02%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
2.71%
Equatorial SA
2.26%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.13%
EDP SA
1.92%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
1.89%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.69%
Doosan Fuel Cell Co., Ltd.
1.63%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
1.57%
Frequently asked questions about PBD and ICLN
How have the PBD and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, PBD is up 13.82% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 12.45%. That puts PBD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBD or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the PBD ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$416M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBD or ICLN?
Over the past year, PBD had a volatility of 23.88%, while ICLN experienced 28.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBD or ICLN?
As of July 17, 2026, PBD holds $191.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.46 B.
What sectors do the PBD and ICLN ETFs invest in?
PBD leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PBD ETF and ICLN ETF?
PBD top holdings include ITM Power Plc, Ballard Power Systems, Inc. and Ceres Power Holdings plc. ICLN holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PBD or ICLN?
PBD holds 110 securities with 24.24% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 105 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PBD & ICLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
September 20, 2022
ICLN
Week of August 8, 2022 KPI summary
August 16, 2022
ICLN
Advertisement
