PAUGvsSPYIETF Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PAUG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.68% for SPYI. PAUG is up 8.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. SPYI performs better with 11.28% YTD performance, and +$5.43B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PAUG and SPYI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PAUG vs SPYI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PAUG SPYI | +1.08%+1.71% | +2.09%+2.73% | +8.14%+11.28% | +10.82%+15.93% | +49.12%+60.69% | +57.47%n/a |
| Flows | PAUG SPYI | -+$465M | +$170M+$1.86B | +$20M+$5.43B | -$32M+$6.58B | -$220M+$11.71B | +$463M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PAUG SPYI | +4.31%+8.90% | +5.19%+10.72% | +7.82%+12.54% | +9.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PAUG SPYI | -1.33%-2.47% | -4.00%-7.69% | -10.47%-16.58% | -11.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PAUG SPYI | 15d15d | 42d48d | 106d125d | 522dn/a |
PAUG | SPYI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.73 | $53.35 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $47.00 | $53.82 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PAUG | SPYI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.73 | $53.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | -0.87% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $12.49 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.68% |
PAUG | SPYI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 1, 2019 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |