OUSAvsACVFETF Comparison
VS
ALPS O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is part of the US Large Cap segment. OUSA's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, ACVF's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. OUSA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.75% for ACVF. OUSA is up 10.54% year-to-date (YTD) with -$145M in YTD flows. ACVF performs better with 11.53% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OUSA and ACVF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OUSA vs ACVF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OUSA ACVF | +5.41%+0.79% | +3.24%+2.21% | +10.54%+11.53% | +13.96%+11.33% | +60.21%+75.39% | +56.05%+64.12% |
| Flows | OUSA ACVF | -$18M+$10K | -$37M-$1M | -$145M+$1M | -$169M+$2M | -$192M+$40M | -$256M+$71M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OUSA ACVF | +10.29%+10.89% | +10.67%+12.75% | +11.69%+14.34% | +13.72%+16.64% |
| Max drawdown | OUSA ACVF | -5.05%-5.09% | -8.39%-7.72% | -13.19%-16.69% | -19.56%-24.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | OUSA ACVF | 55d78d | 143d48d | 253d110d | 709d709d |
Trading data
OUSA | ACVF | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.81 | |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $55.77 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACVF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOUSA | ACVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OUSA | ACVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $54.81 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.73% |
| AuM | $735.41 M | $153.55 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
OUSA | ACVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | O'Shares | Ridgeline Research |
| Benchmark | O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 384 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 14, 2015 | October 29, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OUSA
USA
95.56%
Other
4.44%
ACVF
USA
95.34%
Other
4.66%
Sectors
OUSA
Technology
32.14%
Finance
14.6%
Healthcare
13.39%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.84%
Industrials
8.34%
Other
21.69%
ACVF
Technology
42.14%
Finance
12%
Industrials
8.92%
Healthcare
8.73%
Other
28.21%
Advertisement
Diversification
OUSA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.55%
ACVF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.82%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
OUSA
Microsoft Corp.
5.27%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.23%
Apple, Inc.
5.15%
Johnson & Johnson
5.02%
Visa, Inc.
4.95%
Mastercard, Inc.
4.60%
The Home Depot, Inc.
3.49%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.13%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
3.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.56%
McDonald's Corp.
2.54%
AT&T, Inc.
2.13%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
1.93%
Amgen, Inc.
1.84%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.67%
ACVF
NVIDIA Corp.
8.78%
Microsoft Corp.
5.52%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.70%
Broadcom Inc.
2.44%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.83%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.70%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.67%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.62%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.61%
Walmart, Inc.
1.60%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
1.47%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.23%
Tesla, Inc.
1.15%
Intel Corp.
1.02%
Frequently asked questions about OUSA and ACVF
How have the OUSA and ACVF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, OUSA is up 10.54% year-to-date (YTD), while ACVF has returned 11.53%. That puts ACVF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OUSA or ACVF?
Year-to-date, the OUSA ETF saw -$145M in flows, compared to +$1M for ACVF.
Which ETF is more volatile: OUSA or ACVF?
Over the past year, OUSA had a volatility of 10.67%, while ACVF experienced 12.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: OUSA or ACVF?
As of October 29, 2026, OUSA holds $735.41 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACVF manages $153.55 M.
What sectors do the OUSA and ACVF ETFs invest in?
OUSA leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ACVF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OUSA ETF and ACVF ETF?
OUSA top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and Apple, Inc.. ACVF holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Cisco Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OUSA or ACVF?
OUSA holds 101 securities with 52.55% of its assets in the top 15. ACVF has 387 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.82%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OUSA & ACVF
There’s an ETF for That? America First
February 11, 2025
ACVF
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
November 6, 2024
ACVF
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
OUSA
Advertisement
Advertisement
