Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OEFvsSCLZETF Comparison
iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. OEF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.79% for SCLZ. OEF is down -2.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$200M in YTD flows. SCLZ performs better with -0.49% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OEF and SCLZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OEF vs SCLZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OEF SCLZ | -2.44%-1.28% | -3.22%+0.58% | -2.73%-0.49% | +23.63%+10.31% | +98.02%n/a | +99.83%n/a |
| Flows | OEF SCLZ | +$301M- | +$407M+$1M | +$200M- | +$8.02B+$5M | +$12.81B- | +$13.13B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OEF SCLZ | +12.07%+9.27% | +19.24%+13.16% | +15.80%n/a | +17.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OEF SCLZ | -4.55%-2.59% | -14.24%-9.53% | -19.77%n/a | -26.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OEF SCLZ | 75d35d | 45d43d | 126dn/a | 696dn/a |
OEF | SCLZ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $333.38 | $53.85 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $333.60 | $53.69 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OEF | SCLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OEF | SCLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $333.38 | $53.85 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | +0.30% |
| AuM | $28.58 B | $16.10 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.79% |
OEF | SCLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Swan Capital Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 54 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 23, 2000 | February 27, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OEF and SCLZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, OEF is down -2.73% year-to-date (YTD), while SCLZ has lost -0.49%. That puts SCLZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OEF or SCLZ?
Year-to-date, the OEF ETF saw +$200M in flows, compared to - for SCLZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: OEF or SCLZ?
Over the past year, OEF had a volatility of 19.24%, while SCLZ experienced 13.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: OEF or SCLZ?
As of March 10, 2026, OEF holds $28.58 B in assets under management (AUM), while SCLZ manages $16.10 M.
What sectors do the OEF and SCLZ ETFs invest in?
OEF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SCLZ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the OEF ETF and SCLZ ETF?
OEF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. SCLZ holds in its top three: APPLE, NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: OEF or SCLZ?
OEF holds 102 securities with 61.62% of its assets in the top 15. SCLZ has 54 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.13%.
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 10/21/2025: THESE Sectors Should Drive Q3 Profit Growth
3 ETFs that Beat the S&P 500 in 2024
ETFs for Exposure to the "Magnificent Seven" Stocks
ETFs for Exposure to the "Magnificent Seven" Stocks
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.