OEFvsBAMGETF Comparison
VS
iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. OEF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, BAMG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. OEF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.88% for BAMG. OEF is up 6.46% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10.05B in YTD flows. BAMG performs better with 8.26% YTD performance, and -$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OEF and BAMG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OEF vs BAMG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OEF BAMG | +1.07%-0.30% | +3.30%+7.97% | +6.46%+8.26% | +17.14%+16.90% | +76.96%n/a | +89.06%n/a |
| Flows | OEF BAMG | -$58M-$8M | -$383M-$2M | -$10.05B-$17M | -$4.41B-$11M | +$2.61B- | +$2.81B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OEF BAMG | +14.24%+17.98% | +13.73%+15.78% | +16.13%n/a | +17.90%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OEF BAMG | -5.41%-4.98% | -10.96%-13.08% | -19.77%n/a | -26.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OEF BAMG | 53d10d | 169d126d | 126dn/a | 696dn/a |
Trading data
OEF | BAMG | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $363.22 | $43.31 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $363.23 | $43.25 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BAMG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOEF | BAMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OEF | BAMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $363.22 | $43.31 |
| 1D performance | -0.00% | +0.15% |
| AuM | $19.74 B | $128.79 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.88% |
Characteristics
OEF | BAMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Brookstone Asset Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 23, 2000 | September 27, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OEF
USA
98.96%
Other
1.04%
BAMG
USA
99.6%
Other
0.4%
Sectors
OEF
Technology
53.77%
Finance
11.08%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.3%
Healthcare
8.67%
Other
16.18%
BAMG
Technology
50.19%
Healthcare
12.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.11%
Industrials
8.92%
Finance
8.33%
Other
8.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
OEF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.12%
BAMG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
OEF
NVIDIA Corp.
10.47%
Apple, Inc.
9.18%
Microsoft Corp.
5.99%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.53%
Broadcom Inc.
3.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.61%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.81%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.67%
Tesla, Inc.
2.56%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.05%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.05%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.98%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.90%
Intel Corp.
1.43%
BAMG
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.54%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.48%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.18%
Broadcom Inc.
4.01%
Apple, Inc.
3.90%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.82%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.79%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.20%
Visa, Inc.
2.71%
Johnson & Johnson
2.50%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.26%
Lam Research Corp.
2.08%
Caterpillar, Inc.
2.03%
GE Aerospace
1.81%
Frequently asked questions about OEF and BAMG
How have the OEF and BAMG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, OEF is up 6.46% year-to-date (YTD), while BAMG has returned 8.26%. That puts BAMG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OEF or BAMG?
Year-to-date, the OEF ETF saw -$10.05B in flows, compared to -$17M for BAMG.
Which ETF is more volatile: OEF or BAMG?
Over the past year, OEF had a volatility of 13.73%, while BAMG experienced 15.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: OEF or BAMG?
As of July 24, 2026, OEF holds $19.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while BAMG manages $128.79 M.
What sectors do the OEF and BAMG ETFs invest in?
OEF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, BAMG focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the OEF ETF and BAMG ETF?
OEF top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. BAMG holds in its top three: Micron Technology, Inc., Eli Lilly & Co. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OEF or BAMG?
OEF holds 103 securities with 60.12% of its assets in the top 15. BAMG has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OEF & BAMG
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 10/21/2025: THESE Sectors Should Drive Q3 Profit Growth
October 21, 2025
OEF
3 ETFs that Beat the S&P 500 in 2024
December 24, 2024
OEF
Advertisement
ETFs for Exposure to the "Magnificent Seven" Stocks
July 20, 2023
OEF
ETFs for Exposure to the "Magnificent Seven" Stocks
July 20, 2023
OEF
Advertisement
