NOBLvsTMDVETF Comparison
VS
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. NOBL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, TMDV's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. Both NOBL and TMDV have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%. NOBL is up 13.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$656M in YTD flows. TMDV performs better with 13.96% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NOBL and TMDV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NOBL vs TMDV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NOBL TMDV | +5.73%+4.04% | +4.22%+1.95% | +13.84%+13.96% | +15.64%+13.79% | +46.25%+36.89% | +38.55%+23.44% |
| Flows | NOBL TMDV | -$77M- | -$197M- | -$656M- | -$1.02B- | -$2.38B-$5M | -$36M-$17M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NOBL TMDV | +12.53%+11.58% | +12.17%+12.46% | +12.69%+13.42% | +14.34%+14.70% |
| Max drawdown | NOBL TMDV | -8.01%-7.91% | -9.14%-9.94% | -15.22%-15.91% | -17.94%-17.21% |
| Max drawdown duration | NOBL TMDV | 58d68d | 122d129d | 400d415d | 561d813d |
Trading data
NOBL | TMDV | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.29 | $52.44 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $58.32 | $52.47 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NOBL | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NOBL | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.29 | $52.44 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $11.73 B | $4.73 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.35% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NOBL
USA
91.18%
Other
8.82%
TMDV
USA
98%
Other
2%
Sectors
NOBL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.55%
Industrials
18.24%
Finance
14.19%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.69%
Healthcare
10.68%
Other
23.65%
TMDV
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.11%
Finance
18.42%
Non-Energy Materi.
13.7%
Industrials
12.54%
Utilities
12.52%
Healthcare
7.11%
Other
14.6%
Advertisement
Diversification
NOBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.23%
TMDV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.38%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NOBL
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.72%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.71%
Erie Indemnity Co.
1.70%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
1.68%
Target Corp.
1.65%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.62%
Abbott Laboratories
1.61%
Genuine Parts Co.
1.59%
Nordson Corp.
1.59%
International Business Machines Corp.
1.58%
Albemarle Corp.
1.58%
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.56%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.55%
Medtronic Plc
1.55%
Fastenal Co.
1.54%
TMDV
Genuine Parts Co.
1.97%
Abbott Laboratories
1.89%
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.88%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.83%
Target Corp.
1.80%
RLI Corp.
1.75%
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
1.73%
MSA Safety, Inc.
1.72%
American States Water Co.
1.72%
Nordson Corp.
1.71%
Stepan Co.
1.71%
Johnson & Johnson
1.68%
Sonoco Products Co.
1.68%
Medtronic Plc
1.66%
H2O America
1.65%
Frequently asked questions about NOBL and TMDV
How have the NOBL and TMDV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, NOBL is up 13.84% year-to-date (YTD), while TMDV has returned 13.96%. That puts TMDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NOBL or TMDV?
Year-to-date, the NOBL ETF saw -$656M in flows, compared to - for TMDV.
Which ETF is more volatile: NOBL or TMDV?
Over the past year, NOBL had a volatility of 12.17%, while TMDV experienced 12.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: NOBL or TMDV?
As of October 23, 2026, NOBL holds $11.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while TMDV manages $4.73 M.
What sectors do the NOBL and TMDV ETFs invest in?
NOBL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, TMDV focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Finance and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the NOBL ETF and TMDV ETF?
NOBL top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Roper Technologies, Inc. and Erie Indemnity Co.. TMDV holds in its top three: Genuine Parts Co., Abbott Laboratories and Becton, Dickinson & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: NOBL or TMDV?
NOBL holds 68 securities with 24.23% of its assets in the top 15. TMDV has 64 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.38%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NOBL & TMDV
Advertisement
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Advertisement
