Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NOBLvsSNPDETF Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Xtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETF (SNPD) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. NOBL's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Staples and Financials. In contrast, SNPD's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Staples. NOBL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.15% for SNPD. NOBL is up 3.1% year-to-date (YTD) with -$234M in YTD flows. SNPD performs better with 6.26% YTD performance, and +$287K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NOBL and SNPD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NOBL vs SNPD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NOBL SNPD | -5.32%-4.43% | +2.14%+5.60% | +3.10%+6.26% | +9.14%+11.47% | +30.24%+29.26% | +39.45%n/a |
| Flows | NOBL SNPD | -$39M+$299K | -$392M+$287K | -$234M+$287K | -$1.11B-$554K | -$1.88B-$551K | +$1.19B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NOBL SNPD | +11.20%+10.78% | +14.80%+14.72% | +12.48%+12.88% | +14.21%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NOBL SNPD | -6.38%-4.98% | -11.18%-11.54% | -15.22%-15.72% | -17.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NOBL SNPD | 11d10d | 89d89d | 400d442d | 561dn/a |
NOBL | SNPD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $107.41 | $28.26 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $107.31 | $28.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NOBL | SNPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NOBL | SNPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $107.41 | $28.26 |
| 1D performance | +0.09% | +0.20% |
| AuM | $11.19 B | $5.13 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.15% |
NOBL | SNPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index | S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Screened Index |
| N° of holdings | 67 | 109 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 9, 2013 | November 9, 2022 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NOBL and SNPD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, NOBL is up 3.1% year-to-date (YTD), while SNPD has returned 6.26%. That puts SNPD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NOBL or SNPD?
Year-to-date, the NOBL ETF saw -$234M in flows, compared to +$287K for SNPD.
Which ETF is more volatile: NOBL or SNPD?
Over the past year, NOBL had a volatility of 14.8%, while SNPD experienced 14.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: NOBL or SNPD?
As of March 12, 2026, NOBL holds $11.19 B in assets under management (AUM), while SNPD manages $5.13 M.
What sectors do the NOBL and SNPD ETFs invest in?
NOBL leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Staples and Financials. Meanwhile, SNPD focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the NOBL ETF and SNPD ETF?
NOBL top holdings include ALBEMARLE, CH ROBINSON WW and EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASN. SNPD holds in its top three: FRANKLIN RSC, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS and UGI.
Which ETF is more diversified: NOBL or SNPD?
NOBL holds 68 securities with 26.08% of its assets in the top 15. SNPD has 111 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.01%.
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
